Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9061 - 9070 of 12796 for se.
Search results 9061 - 9070 of 12796 for se.
[PDF]
NOTICE
deliberations is per se reversible error or, in the alternative, maintain the rule of a rebuttable presumption
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58207 - 2014-09-15
deliberations is per se reversible error or, in the alternative, maintain the rule of a rebuttable presumption
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58207 - 2014-09-15
State v. Christopher L. Ambort
DEININGER, J.[1] Christopher Ambort, pro se, appeals an order revoking his motor vehicle operating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26093 - 2006-08-02
DEININGER, J.[1] Christopher Ambort, pro se, appeals an order revoking his motor vehicle operating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26093 - 2006-08-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
se, appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion for sentence modification
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=571251 - 2022-09-27
se, appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion for sentence modification
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=571251 - 2022-09-27
State v. Terry Raheem Jones
“are per se unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment - subject only to a few specifically established
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11943 - 2005-03-31
“are per se unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment - subject only to a few specifically established
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11943 - 2005-03-31
State v. James E. Janssen
or magistrate, are per se unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment, subject only to a few specifically
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11897 - 2005-03-31
or magistrate, are per se unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment, subject only to a few specifically
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11897 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
interest in proceeding pro se, however, the court reasonably refused to allow Dobbins’ appointed trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=955204 - 2025-05-13
interest in proceeding pro se, however, the court reasonably refused to allow Dobbins’ appointed trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=955204 - 2025-05-13
Jerry Saenz v. John Husz
ATTORNEYSFor the petitioner-appellant the cause was submitted on the briefs of Jerry Saenz, pro se
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8599 - 2005-03-31
ATTORNEYSFor the petitioner-appellant the cause was submitted on the briefs of Jerry Saenz, pro se
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8599 - 2005-03-31
Elaine Marie Ziebell v. Richard Gerald Ziebell
. Sept. 3, 2002) (No. 00-3530), we held that the failure of a pro se appellant to sign a notice of appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5693 - 2005-03-31
. Sept. 3, 2002) (No. 00-3530), we held that the failure of a pro se appellant to sign a notice of appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5693 - 2005-03-31
Village of Tigerton v. Donald Minniecheske
related to the same issues, these statutes would be virtually useless against a pro se party who cannot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11071 - 2005-03-31
related to the same issues, these statutes would be virtually useless against a pro se party who cannot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11071 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. Id. However, we concluded the spousal relationship established per se bias in the PSI writer. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53663 - 2010-08-23
. Id. However, we concluded the spousal relationship established per se bias in the PSI writer. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53663 - 2010-08-23