Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9071 - 9080 of 30126 for consulta de causas.

[PDF] NOTICE
questions of constitutional fact de novo. Id. ¶6 We begin by reviewing the applicable law pertaining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31823 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Willie M. Thomas
satisfy the constitutional requirement of reasonableness is a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2570 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Patrick D. Dawson
an investigative stop meets the constitutional standard of reasonableness is a question of law subject to de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2594 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Douglas Vaughn, Jr. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Company
is de novo. See Robert E. Lee & Assocs., Inc. v. Peters, 209 Wis.2d 437, 446, 563 N.W.2d 546, 549
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13406 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
erroneous, but whether those facts pass constitutional muster is a question of law we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213537 - 2018-05-30

[PDF] WI APP 222
4 Interpretation of this statute, as with others, is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30332 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Kenneth L. Champion
meets this test is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. at 310. Nos. 00-2998 01
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3488 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Phillip C.P.
a question of statutory interpretation, a question of law we review de novo. State v. Michels, 141 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12832 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that this court reviews de novo.” State v. Edwards, 2003 WI 68, ¶7, 262 Wis. 2d 448, 665 N.W.2d 136. Because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=804071 - 2024-05-21

Kari K. Stuckel v. Mildred K. Olsen
as the trial court, making our review de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315, 401 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7138 - 2005-03-31