Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9071 - 9080 of 30126 for consulta de causas.
Search results 9071 - 9080 of 30126 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
of a statute de novo. Id., ¶13. We perceive no error in the denial of Dunay’s petition. Insofar
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1020843 - 2025-10-08
of a statute de novo. Id., ¶13. We perceive no error in the denial of Dunay’s petition. Insofar
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1020843 - 2025-10-08
Sierra Club v. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
Statutory interpretation presents a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Waushara County Bd
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21514 - 2006-02-22
Statutory interpretation presents a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Waushara County Bd
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21514 - 2006-02-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, is de novo. State v. Powers, 2004 WI App 143, ¶6, 275 Wis. 2d 456, 462, 685 N.W.2d 869. ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83070 - 2014-09-15
, is de novo. State v. Powers, 2004 WI App 143, ¶6, 275 Wis. 2d 456, 462, 685 N.W.2d 869. ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83070 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
that we review on a de novo basis. Folkman v. Quamme, 2003 WI 116, ¶12, 264 Wis. 2d 617, 665 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35676 - 2014-09-15
that we review on a de novo basis. Folkman v. Quamme, 2003 WI 116, ¶12, 264 Wis. 2d 617, 665 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35676 - 2014-09-15
Ray A. Peterson v. Mark Baker
complaint. Peterson demanded a trial de novo, and a trial to the circuit court was scheduled for July 19
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5501 - 2005-03-31
complaint. Peterson demanded a trial de novo, and a trial to the circuit court was scheduled for July 19
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5501 - 2005-03-31
State v. Troy A. Bruley
despite our de novo standard of review. Scheunemann v. City of West Bend, 179 Wis. 2d 469, 475, 507 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5192 - 2005-03-31
despite our de novo standard of review. Scheunemann v. City of West Bend, 179 Wis. 2d 469, 475, 507 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5192 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
de novo. State v. Bodoh, 226 Wis. 2d 718, 724, 595 N.W.2d 330 (1999). ¶7 Wisconsin Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47006 - 2010-02-16
de novo. State v. Bodoh, 226 Wis. 2d 718, 724, 595 N.W.2d 330 (1999). ¶7 Wisconsin Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47006 - 2010-02-16
State v. Michael A. Marshalek
. In addition, the legality of a traffic stop is a question of law we also review de novo. State v. Baudhuin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4219 - 2005-03-31
. In addition, the legality of a traffic stop is a question of law we also review de novo. State v. Baudhuin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4219 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jacob W. Hatcher
decide de novo. Id. ¶9 An investigatory stop is a “seizure” for constitutional purposes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5746 - 2005-03-31
decide de novo. Id. ¶9 An investigatory stop is a “seizure” for constitutional purposes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5746 - 2005-03-31
State v. Frank J. Steffes
review de novo. See State v. Sutton, 177 Wis.2d 709, 716, 503 N.W.2d 326, 329 (Ct. App. 1993
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14807 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. See State v. Sutton, 177 Wis.2d 709, 716, 503 N.W.2d 326, 329 (Ct. App. 1993
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14807 - 2005-03-31