Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9081 - 9090 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 9081 - 9090 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
NOTICE
dismissing her motion and supplemental motion to modify placement. Rose argues that her motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35734 - 2014-09-15
dismissing her motion and supplemental motion to modify placement. Rose argues that her motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35734 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. STAT. § 974.06 (2013-14) motion. 1 The circuit court denied the motion after it determined
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156068 - 2017-09-21
. STAT. § 974.06 (2013-14) motion. 1 The circuit court denied the motion after it determined
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156068 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
court order denying his motion for relief from a 1997 judgment of conviction. He contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=909757 - 2025-02-04
court order denying his motion for relief from a 1997 judgment of conviction. He contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=909757 - 2025-02-04
COURT OF APPEALS
motion and supplemental motion to modify placement. Rose argues that her motion was sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35734 - 2009-03-04
motion and supplemental motion to modify placement. Rose argues that her motion was sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35734 - 2009-03-04
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 17, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
concentration. Nienke claims the trial court erred by denying his motion to dismiss for prejudicial delay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26788 - 2006-10-16
concentration. Nienke claims the trial court erred by denying his motion to dismiss for prejudicial delay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26788 - 2006-10-16
Eugene Harris v. Judy Smith
(1)(q). They … remain in the legal custody of, and in institutional status with, the Department
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12808 - 2005-03-31
(1)(q). They … remain in the legal custody of, and in institutional status with, the Department
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12808 - 2005-03-31
State v. Dennis M. Heath
at his home. Because Heath was not in custody, it was not necessary for the police to read him his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15152 - 2005-03-31
at his home. Because Heath was not in custody, it was not necessary for the police to read him his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15152 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Eugene Harris v. Judy Smith
on the inmate’s person.” WIS. ADM. CODE § DOC 327.09(1)(q). They … remain in the legal custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12808 - 2017-09-21
on the inmate’s person.” WIS. ADM. CODE § DOC 327.09(1)(q). They … remain in the legal custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12808 - 2017-09-21
County of Dane v. John S. McKenzie
that the State [sic] in proving up a chain of custody has to satisfy me that as to the integrity of the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2496 - 2005-03-31
that the State [sic] in proving up a chain of custody has to satisfy me that as to the integrity of the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2496 - 2005-03-31
Sharon Mowery v. James E. Mowery
1992, an order reinstated child support for Jaime because James no longer had custody of Jaime
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9579 - 2005-03-31
1992, an order reinstated child support for Jaime because James no longer had custody of Jaime
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9579 - 2005-03-31