Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9081 - 9090 of 84253 for case number.

Date: May 5, 2006 To: Clerk of Court of Appeals From: District 3 Opinions for Release On May 9, 20...
, 2006 Opinion Case Number Short Caption CountyName 2005AP003074 State v. Jude G. Trautlein Buffalo
/ca/mitl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25101 - 2006-05-04

Date: July 9, 2013 To: Clerk of Court of Appeals From: District 4 Opinions for Release On July 11,...
, 2013 Opinion Case Number Short Caption CountyName 2012AP002206 Richard Hamre v. Cesar Pontidoro Dane
/ca/mitl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99238 - 2013-07-08

Date: February 19, 2008 To: Clerk of Court of Appeals From: District 4 Opinions for Release On Feb...
On February 21, 2008 Opinion Case Number Short Caption CountyName 2007AP001121 CR State v. Mark A. Skau
/ca/mitl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31893 - 2008-02-18

Date: July 20, 2011 To: Clerk of Court of Appeals From: District 4 Opinions for Release On July 20...
20, 2011 Opinion Case Number Short Caption CountyName 2010AP001655 D'AnnK. v. Benjamin J. G
/ca/mitl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68372 - 2011-07-19

Date: July 29, 2008 To: Clerk of Court of Appeals From: District 4 Opinions for Release On July 31...
31, 2008 Opinion Case Number Short Caption CountyName 2008AP000729 CR State v. Catherine A. Schutz
/ca/mitl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33570 - 2008-07-28

Date: July 9, 2010 To: Clerk of Court of Appeals From: District 1 Opinions for Release On July 13,...
, 2010 Per Curiam Case Number Short Caption CountyName 2009AP003033 State v. William Edwards Milwaukee
/ca/mitl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51970 - 2010-07-08

[MS WORD] SC-5420VB: Order For Money Judgment Non-Eviction (Small Claims)
. Enter the case number. The parties entered into a stipulation for dismissal in this case
/formdisplay/SC-5420VB.doc?formNumber=SC-5420VB&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2025-03-12

COURT OF APPEALS
not explained the deviation.[5] Zimbrick contended that three past Division cases evidenced a prior practice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78510 - 2012-02-22

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that three past Division cases evidenced a prior practice of analyzing the three public interest factors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78510 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
not have the caller’s phone number because the call came through the sheriff’s “admin line,” which does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66848 - 2014-09-15