Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9081 - 9090 of 12458 for mr.
Search results 9081 - 9090 of 12458 for mr.
[PDF]
William Pangman v.
, “to ensure that proper decorum would be maintained in view of the amazing behavior of Mr. Pangman
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17079 - 2017-09-21
, “to ensure that proper decorum would be maintained in view of the amazing behavior of Mr. Pangman
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17079 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
camera “would have shown Mr. Nelson did not spit on [K.H.].” The only fact in the record regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=329192 - 2021-01-28
camera “would have shown Mr. Nelson did not spit on [K.H.].” The only fact in the record regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=329192 - 2021-01-28
[PDF]
State v. Kevin S. Meehan
-- rubbing on his penis? …. Q Mr. Holmes, did [Meehan] tell you that what happened in that case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13461 - 2017-09-21
-- rubbing on his penis? …. Q Mr. Holmes, did [Meehan] tell you that what happened in that case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13461 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. George C. Lohmeier
has presented." Mr. Lohmeier’s defense did not hinge on whether the girls' actions legally
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16941 - 2017-09-21
has presented." Mr. Lohmeier’s defense did not hinge on whether the girls' actions legally
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16941 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to “retract back to the up position.” The officer did this because he “wanted to continue to contact Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=223908 - 2018-11-14
to “retract back to the up position.” The officer did this because he “wanted to continue to contact Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=223908 - 2018-11-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
additional testimony in support of the alternative basis for Mr. Kucharski’s NGI defense—that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162280 - 2017-09-21
additional testimony in support of the alternative basis for Mr. Kucharski’s NGI defense—that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162280 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the Court did not believe Mr. Guttu as to his representation that he did Nos. 2012AP128-CR 2012AP129
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89657 - 2014-09-15
that the Court did not believe Mr. Guttu as to his representation that he did Nos. 2012AP128-CR 2012AP129
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89657 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Richard Dodson
believe? We have, on the one hand, Mr. Dodson saying it never happened, I never did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10793 - 2017-09-20
believe? We have, on the one hand, Mr. Dodson saying it never happened, I never did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10793 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
WI App 68
incident involved an allegation of “intercourse”; (5) during which “the victims indicate they told Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=872269 - 2025-01-24
incident involved an allegation of “intercourse”; (5) during which “the victims indicate they told Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=872269 - 2025-01-24
State v. Duane G. Heath
was undeniably attributable to the single status of Mr. Heath because he was an unmarried parent and the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25746 - 2006-07-04
was undeniably attributable to the single status of Mr. Heath because he was an unmarried parent and the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25746 - 2006-07-04