Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9091 - 9100 of 17744 for ex.
Search results 9091 - 9100 of 17744 for ex.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
for reconsideration of the court’s order. The DOC argued that although the court had properly relied on State ex
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1047220 - 2025-12-10
for reconsideration of the court’s order. The DOC argued that although the court had properly relied on State ex
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1047220 - 2025-12-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of law that we review de novo. State ex rel. Washington v. State, 2012 WI App 74, ¶27, 343 Wis. 2d 434
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1088985 - 2026-03-10
of law that we review de novo. State ex rel. Washington v. State, 2012 WI App 74, ¶27, 343 Wis. 2d 434
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1088985 - 2026-03-10
Wisconsin Court System - Court of Appeals opinion search results
selected files button. All files will be compressed into a self-extracting exe file that you can download
/other/appeals/caopin.jsp?SortBy=date&begin_date=03/31/2026&end_date=03/31/2026
selected files button. All files will be compressed into a self-extracting exe file that you can download
/other/appeals/caopin.jsp?SortBy=date&begin_date=03/31/2026&end_date=03/31/2026
CA Blank Order
. 738, 744 (1967); and State ex rel. McCoy v. Wisconsin Court of Appeals, 137 Wis. 2d 90, 403 N.W.2d 449
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145420 - 2008-07-28
. 738, 744 (1967); and State ex rel. McCoy v. Wisconsin Court of Appeals, 137 Wis. 2d 90, 403 N.W.2d 449
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145420 - 2008-07-28
CA Blank Order
. See State ex rel. Flowers v. Dept. of Health & Soc. Servs., 81 Wis. 2d 376, 384, 260 N.W.2d 727, 732
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91978 - 2013-01-21
. See State ex rel. Flowers v. Dept. of Health & Soc. Servs., 81 Wis. 2d 376, 384, 260 N.W.2d 727, 732
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91978 - 2013-01-21
CA Blank Order
. See State ex rel. Johnson v. Cady, 50 Wis. 2d 540, 550, 185 N.W.2d 306 (1971) (judicial review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117400 - 2014-07-22
. See State ex rel. Johnson v. Cady, 50 Wis. 2d 540, 550, 185 N.W.2d 306 (1971) (judicial review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117400 - 2014-07-22
State v. Travis S. Olson
they suggest an express quid pro quo for a confession); State ex rel. Collins v. Superior Court, 702 P.2d 1338
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4068 - 2005-04-26
they suggest an express quid pro quo for a confession); State ex rel. Collins v. Superior Court, 702 P.2d 1338
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4068 - 2005-04-26
COURT OF APPEALS
State ex rel. Walker v. Circuit Court for Outagamie Cnty., 2010AP2494-W, unpublished slip op. (Wis. Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73830 - 2011-11-14
State ex rel. Walker v. Circuit Court for Outagamie Cnty., 2010AP2494-W, unpublished slip op. (Wis. Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73830 - 2011-11-14
State v. Gerald Seay
, that the victim’s parents had affected her testimony, that his ex-wife had prejudiced his neighbors against him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13899 - 2012-07-18
, that the victim’s parents had affected her testimony, that his ex-wife had prejudiced his neighbors against him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13899 - 2012-07-18
Robert M. Pace v. Oneida County
, Defendant-Appellant. No. 98-0059-W state of Wisconsin ex rel. Robert M. Pace, Jean Pace and all Owners
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13242 - 2014-11-10
, Defendant-Appellant. No. 98-0059-W state of Wisconsin ex rel. Robert M. Pace, Jean Pace and all Owners
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13242 - 2014-11-10