Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9091 - 9100 of 70056 for hi.
Search results 9091 - 9100 of 70056 for hi.
CA Blank Order
there is no basis for Denny to withdraw his no contest plea or challenge the sentence imposed for fourth-offense
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138107 - 2015-03-23
there is no basis for Denny to withdraw his no contest plea or challenge the sentence imposed for fourth-offense
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138107 - 2015-03-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the revocation of his probation. Attorney Kirk Henley has filed a no-merit report seeking to withdraw
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=910644 - 2025-02-06
the revocation of his probation. Attorney Kirk Henley has filed a no-merit report seeking to withdraw
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=910644 - 2025-02-06
[PDF]
State v. Willie Bankston
-2- STATS., and from an order denying his postconviction motion for relief.2 The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8334 - 2017-09-19
-2- STATS., and from an order denying his postconviction motion for relief.2 The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8334 - 2017-09-19
Frontsheet
that the appropriate level of discipline is the revocation of his license to practice law. ¶2 We approve
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90800 - 2012-12-17
that the appropriate level of discipline is the revocation of his license to practice law. ¶2 We approve
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90800 - 2012-12-17
CA Blank Order
a no-merit report concluding there is no arguable basis for Bearheart to challenge his convictions
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101961 - 2013-09-16
a no-merit report concluding there is no arguable basis for Bearheart to challenge his convictions
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101961 - 2013-09-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
under WIS. STAT. §§ 948.07(1) and 948.02(1)(b) (2009-10).1 He also appeals the order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64335 - 2014-09-15
under WIS. STAT. §§ 948.07(1) and 948.02(1)(b) (2009-10).1 He also appeals the order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64335 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Robert J. Ehmke
that the State presented insufficient evidence to support his conviction. More specifically, he contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15731 - 2017-09-21
that the State presented insufficient evidence to support his conviction. More specifically, he contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15731 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2013-14),[1] postconviction motion for a new trial. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135068 - 2015-02-17
his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2013-14),[1] postconviction motion for a new trial. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135068 - 2015-02-17
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Robert Smith appeals a judgment, entered upon his no contest plea, convicting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46458 - 2010-02-01
. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Robert Smith appeals a judgment, entered upon his no contest plea, convicting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46458 - 2010-02-01
State v. Lee Crouthers
denying his postconviction motion for sentence modification. He claims the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15534 - 2005-03-31
denying his postconviction motion for sentence modification. He claims the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15534 - 2005-03-31