Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 911 - 920 of 17414 for Cost.
Search results 911 - 920 of 17414 for Cost.
[PDF]
David Burch v. Village of Hammond
an ordinance under this section that imposes impact fees on developers to pay for the capital costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5947 - 2017-09-19
an ordinance under this section that imposes impact fees on developers to pay for the capital costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5947 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and costs the Doctors incurred in defending this appeal. ¶2 Nolasco had an employment agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102237 - 2017-09-21
and costs the Doctors incurred in defending this appeal. ¶2 Nolasco had an employment agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102237 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
effect on the collateral consequences of Isaac’s firearm ban or his cost of care, which typically
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=811896 - 2024-06-11
effect on the collateral consequences of Isaac’s firearm ban or his cost of care, which typically
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=811896 - 2024-06-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
effect on the collateral consequences of Isaac’s firearm ban or his cost of care, which typically
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=811896 - 2024-06-11
effect on the collateral consequences of Isaac’s firearm ban or his cost of care, which typically
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=811896 - 2024-06-11
[PDF]
NOTICE
. The trial court concluded that under applicable law, OSD is responsible for B.W.’s education costs. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31951 - 2014-09-15
. The trial court concluded that under applicable law, OSD is responsible for B.W.’s education costs. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31951 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
is responsible for B.W.’s education costs. We agree and therefore affirm. ¶2 The trial court decided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31951 - 2008-02-27
is responsible for B.W.’s education costs. We agree and therefore affirm. ¶2 The trial court decided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31951 - 2008-02-27
[PDF]
Randy Duncan v. Kenneth Gillingham
nevertheless, and whether it properly refused to reduce the award by a proportional amount of the costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11008 - 2017-09-19
nevertheless, and whether it properly refused to reduce the award by a proportional amount of the costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11008 - 2017-09-19
Randy Duncan v. Kenneth Gillingham
to reduce the award by a proportional amount of the costs and fees Duncan incurred in litigating his claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11008 - 2005-03-31
to reduce the award by a proportional amount of the costs and fees Duncan incurred in litigating his claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11008 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Grain Dryer Systems v. Kevin Adams
was not fully tried, and (6) the trial court erred in allowing Adams to tax certain costs. We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15816 - 2017-09-21
was not fully tried, and (6) the trial court erred in allowing Adams to tax certain costs. We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15816 - 2017-09-21
2008 WI APP 52
of costs, arguing it was an erroneous exercise of discretion to assess the full costs of the action against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32233 - 2011-06-14
of costs, arguing it was an erroneous exercise of discretion to assess the full costs of the action against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32233 - 2011-06-14