Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9101 - 9110 of 24568 for extending.
Search results 9101 - 9110 of 24568 for extending.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a sobriety requirement during his extended supervision and incorrectly stated that the victim was shot
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=450404 - 2021-11-09
a sobriety requirement during his extended supervision and incorrectly stated that the victim was shot
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=450404 - 2021-11-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and six months’ initial confinement and three years and six months’ extended supervision. Czysz filed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=623268 - 2023-02-22
and six months’ initial confinement and three years and six months’ extended supervision. Czysz filed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=623268 - 2023-02-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to a crime. He was sentenced to five years of initial confinement and three years of extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=338259 - 2021-02-24
to a crime. He was sentenced to five years of initial confinement and three years of extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=338259 - 2021-02-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
years of initial confinement and five years of extended supervision. This no-merit appeal follows
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219665 - 2018-09-26
years of initial confinement and five years of extended supervision. This no-merit appeal follows
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219665 - 2018-09-26
CA Blank Order
and five years of extended supervision. Valoe filed a postconviction motion for a new trial, claiming
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119843 - 2014-08-18
and five years of extended supervision. Valoe filed a postconviction motion for a new trial, claiming
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119843 - 2014-08-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
confinement followed by ten years of extended supervision. This no-merit appeal follows. The no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164646 - 2017-09-21
confinement followed by ten years of extended supervision. This no-merit appeal follows. The no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164646 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
withheld sentence and placed him on two years’ probation, consecutive to his extended supervision ordered
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113217 - 2014-06-03
withheld sentence and placed him on two years’ probation, consecutive to his extended supervision ordered
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113217 - 2014-06-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-in for sentencing purposes. Regardless of the reason VerHagen’s probation was extended, the court accurately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68176 - 2014-09-15
-in for sentencing purposes. Regardless of the reason VerHagen’s probation was extended, the court accurately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68176 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of extended supervision. We affirm. ¶2 When sentencing a defendant, the circuit court must consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74796 - 2014-09-15
of extended supervision. We affirm. ¶2 When sentencing a defendant, the circuit court must consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74796 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
assault charge of six years’ initial confinement and six years’ extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211798 - 2018-04-25
assault charge of six years’ initial confinement and six years’ extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211798 - 2018-04-25