Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9101 - 9110 of 58571 for speedy trial.

[PDF] State v. Craig A. Sommer
the trial court order denying his motion for sentence modification. We affirm. Nos. 94-2608-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8157 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Trace J. McKay
. McKay contends that the trial court erred in the No. 99-0017-CR 2 exercise of its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14956 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Larry A. Peterson
trial on these charges. The first trial ended in a guilty verdict. However, on appeal we reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7081 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. James F. Weber
knowingly, freely and voluntarily; (2) the trial court misused its sentencing discretion by imposing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15646 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Gary L. Klotz
for postconviction relief. The issues on appeal are whether the trial court properly denied Klotz’s postsentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4882 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
Latimer appeals a judgment of eviction entered following a trial to the court. Latimer argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56355 - 2010-11-03

[PDF] State v. Tracy L. Singleton
claims the trial court erred in summarily denying his motion without conducting an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26300 - 2017-09-21

State v. Victoria D. Roesing
. § 346.63(1)(a) (1999-2000).[2] Roesing claims that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3305 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jamal Purifoy
an order denying his postconviction motion, which sought plea withdrawal. Purifoy claims the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9077 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 20, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
that the admission of the other acts evidence was proper and that the trial court’s failure to exercise its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27439 - 2006-12-19