Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9111 - 9120 of 68963 for did.
Search results 9111 - 9120 of 68963 for did.
[PDF]
NOTICE
it was discovered that Strociek had moved. It is undisputed that Strociek did not respond to the admission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32159 - 2014-09-15
it was discovered that Strociek had moved. It is undisputed that Strociek did not respond to the admission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32159 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Armond N. Henderson
reason for not raising the issues in the direct (no-merit) appeal, we conclude that the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26419 - 2017-09-21
reason for not raising the issues in the direct (no-merit) appeal, we conclude that the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26419 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
by the hygiene lab was in fact Burkins’ blood. Counsel also noted the hygiene lab did not test the blood
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98334 - 2013-06-24
by the hygiene lab was in fact Burkins’ blood. Counsel also noted the hygiene lab did not test the blood
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98334 - 2013-06-24
[PDF]
State v. Casey J. Shelton
did have probable cause and therefore affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Deputy Gregory J. Niles was the only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3930 - 2017-09-20
did have probable cause and therefore affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Deputy Gregory J. Niles was the only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3930 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Bobbie L. Wilson
his sentence. We conclude that Wilson did not demonstrate the existence of a new factor requiring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18677 - 2017-09-21
his sentence. We conclude that Wilson did not demonstrate the existence of a new factor requiring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18677 - 2017-09-21
Skycom, Inc. v. Town of Elba Town Board
for dismissal of the appeal as untimely. Skycom did not oppose that dismissal, and advised us that its intent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3356 - 2005-03-31
for dismissal of the appeal as untimely. Skycom did not oppose that dismissal, and advised us that its intent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3356 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
did not understand the nature of the charge and because trial counsel was ineffective when counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1033539 - 2025-11-06
did not understand the nature of the charge and because trial counsel was ineffective when counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1033539 - 2025-11-06
State v. Marty S. Madeiros
) constitutes double jeopardy and a violation of his due process rights. Because Madeiros did not move
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3069 - 2005-03-31
) constitutes double jeopardy and a violation of his due process rights. Because Madeiros did not move
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3069 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the limited and exclusive contract remedies for the allegedly nonconforming VFDs. Reinders did not produce
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108062 - 2017-09-21
of the limited and exclusive contract remedies for the allegedly nonconforming VFDs. Reinders did not produce
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108062 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Kevin L. Guibord
of discretionary reversal because the trial court did not allow him to explain probable cause to the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8889 - 2017-09-19
of discretionary reversal because the trial court did not allow him to explain probable cause to the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8889 - 2017-09-19