Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9111 - 9120 of 63511 for records.
Search results 9111 - 9120 of 63511 for records.
[PDF]
Malcolm H. v. Marc J. Ackerman
the record, we conclude that Ackerman is entitled to absolute immunity. He was initially contacted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11441 - 2017-09-19
the record, we conclude that Ackerman is entitled to absolute immunity. He was initially contacted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11441 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude that no arguably meritorious issues exist for an appeal. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=821130 - 2024-07-03
of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude that no arguably meritorious issues exist for an appeal. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=821130 - 2024-07-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Robert ignored or inadequately complied with formal and informal discovery requests. The record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=148662 - 2017-09-21
Robert ignored or inadequately complied with formal and informal discovery requests. The record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=148662 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to file a response, but she has not responded. Based upon an independent review of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1016020 - 2025-09-30
to file a response, but she has not responded. Based upon an independent review of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1016020 - 2025-09-30
[PDF]
State v. Charles Patterson
adjudications [and] the records of the subject’s juvenile court proceedings [may not be introduced as evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15488 - 2017-09-21
adjudications [and] the records of the subject’s juvenile court proceedings [may not be introduced as evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15488 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Larry Tiepelman v. Phil Kingston
to raise on appeal, the record is insufficient to decide the remaining issue No. 98-1996 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14252 - 2014-09-15
to raise on appeal, the record is insufficient to decide the remaining issue No. 98-1996 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14252 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
considering the no-merit report and the response, and after conducting an independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139181 - 2015-04-01
considering the no-merit report and the response, and after conducting an independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139181 - 2015-04-01
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we conclude there is no arguable merit to any issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1065791 - 2026-01-21
of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we conclude there is no arguable merit to any issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1065791 - 2026-01-21
William J. Evers v. Robert J. Lerner
it was not entered in writing or signed. This argument is without support in the record and we reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11149 - 2005-03-31
it was not entered in writing or signed. This argument is without support in the record and we reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11149 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to harass or intimidate the petitioner.” The record reflects that the judge properly applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250048 - 2019-11-14
to harass or intimidate the petitioner.” The record reflects that the judge properly applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250048 - 2019-11-14