Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9111 - 9120 of 12871 for se.
Search results 9111 - 9120 of 12871 for se.
[PDF]
Stephen J. Weissenberger v. Robert Zebro
HOOVER, P.J. Stephen Weissenberger, pro se, appeals an order quashing his writs of mandamus to compel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14549 - 2017-09-21
HOOVER, P.J. Stephen Weissenberger, pro se, appeals an order quashing his writs of mandamus to compel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14549 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). Roosevelt J. Rayford, pro se, appeals a circuit court order that denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=806515 - 2024-05-29
in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). Roosevelt J. Rayford, pro se, appeals a circuit court order that denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=806515 - 2024-05-29
Ronald W. Morters v. Charles H. Barr
. Morters appeals pro se from the order granting the defendants’ motion for costs and attorney’s fees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5653 - 2005-03-31
. Morters appeals pro se from the order granting the defendants’ motion for costs and attorney’s fees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5653 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
occurred in November 2023. Both the Petitioner and Van Engel appeared pro se. Only the Petitioner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=884685 - 2024-12-04
occurred in November 2023. Both the Petitioner and Van Engel appeared pro se. Only the Petitioner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=884685 - 2024-12-04
Leea N. Power v. James M. Muhammad
CURLEY, J. James M. Muhammad appeals, pro se, from the trial court’s order denying his motion seeking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17971 - 2005-05-02
CURLEY, J. James M. Muhammad appeals, pro se, from the trial court’s order denying his motion seeking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17971 - 2005-05-02
[PDF]
State v. Daniel J. Beck
prohibitum as well as malum in se. Nielsen v. Oregon, 212 U.S. 315, 320 (1909). No. 96-0790
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10566 - 2017-09-20
prohibitum as well as malum in se. Nielsen v. Oregon, 212 U.S. 315, 320 (1909). No. 96-0790
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10566 - 2017-09-20
Sara M. Sandberg v. John P. Donahue
court properly exercised its discretion.”). Donahue, who was proceeding pro se at that time, had made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6238 - 2005-03-31
court properly exercised its discretion.”). Donahue, who was proceeding pro se at that time, had made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6238 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
se, appeals from an order that denied his WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2015-16)1 motion without a hearing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245938 - 2019-08-28
se, appeals from an order that denied his WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2015-16)1 motion without a hearing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245938 - 2019-08-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
HIGGINBOTHAM, J. 1 Joseph William Netzer, pro se, appeals a judgment convicting him of operating a motor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=152793 - 2017-09-21
HIGGINBOTHAM, J. 1 Joseph William Netzer, pro se, appeals a judgment convicting him of operating a motor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=152793 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
Driggers’ request to discharge counsel so that he could file a pro se petition for leave to appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97969 - 2014-09-15
Driggers’ request to discharge counsel so that he could file a pro se petition for leave to appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97969 - 2014-09-15