Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9121 - 9130 of 18714 for quote.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
(quoting Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 27 (1968)). Rather, an officer’s reasonable suspicion must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=293794 - 2020-10-06

[PDF] WI APP 12
the statute’s manifest purpose.” Id. (quoted source and internal citations omitted). ¶11 Neither party
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183046 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
N.W.2d 813 (1980) (quoted source omitted); see also WIS. STAT. § 805.17(2) (“due regard shall
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133987 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Michael R. Weber
an offense known to law.’” Id. at 317, 538 N.W.2d at 813 (quoted source omitted). Weber was charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14517 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
(1997) (quoting United States v. Wade, 388 U.S. 218, 241 (1967)). The State has the burden to show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29018 - 2007-05-15

COURT OF APPEALS
by an expert testifying in a prior proceeding.’” Id., ¶39 (quoting State v. Combs, 2006 WI App 137, ¶32, 295
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121562 - 2014-09-16

COURT OF APPEALS
the defendant to relief. See State v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d 303, 309-10, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996) (quoting Nelson v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55693 - 2010-10-20

[PDF] SC Clerk-Ltr
committee notes. The Wisconsin Judicial Council filed an amended petition on October 21, 2012, quoting
/sc/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102179 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, 648 N.W.2d 507 (quoted sources omitted). Finally, counsel asserts that he is not aware of any new
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132458 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, 659 N.W.2d 394 (quoted source omitted). ¶10 Shurpit argues that the “collective knowledge” doctrine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102328 - 2017-09-21