Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9121 - 9130 of 63539 for records.
Search results 9121 - 9130 of 63539 for records.
State v. Clyde B. Williams
review of the record, we questioned our jurisdiction over the appeal due to uncertainty about when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14806 - 2005-03-31
review of the record, we questioned our jurisdiction over the appeal due to uncertainty about when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14806 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that were subsequently dismissed, and that the subsequent dismissal constitutes a new factor. The record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33696 - 2008-08-11
that were subsequently dismissed, and that the subsequent dismissal constitutes a new factor. The record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33696 - 2008-08-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, was advised of his right to file a response, and has responded. We have independently reviewed the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=863478 - 2024-10-22
, was advised of his right to file a response, and has responded. We have independently reviewed the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=863478 - 2024-10-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
his voice heard and was told to let his attorney speak for him. Upon reviewing the entire record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209060 - 2018-02-27
his voice heard and was told to let his attorney speak for him. Upon reviewing the entire record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209060 - 2018-02-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we modify the judgment of conviction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208236 - 2018-02-14
review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we modify the judgment of conviction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208236 - 2018-02-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a default judgment. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183089 - 2017-09-21
a default judgment. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183089 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is No. 2017AP1649-CR 2 appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218419 - 2018-09-05
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is No. 2017AP1649-CR 2 appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218419 - 2018-09-05
CA Blank Order
of the record, as mandated by Anders, and counsel’s report, we conclude there is no issue of arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92215 - 2013-01-24
of the record, as mandated by Anders, and counsel’s report, we conclude there is no issue of arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92215 - 2013-01-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
consideration of the report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113965 - 2017-09-21
consideration of the report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113965 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104673 - 2017-09-21
not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104673 - 2017-09-21