Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9131 - 9140 of 25984 for bench warrant/1000.
Search results 9131 - 9140 of 25984 for bench warrant/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
is correct that the swab required a warrant or his consent, and further that his apparently voluntary consent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31146 - 2007-12-11
is correct that the swab required a warrant or his consent, and further that his apparently voluntary consent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31146 - 2007-12-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
modification was not warranted. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 In January 1991, when he was fifteen years old
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104027 - 2017-09-21
modification was not warranted. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 In January 1991, when he was fifteen years old
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104027 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
property without a warrant or permission. He also argues that the trial court’s rulings regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56188 - 2010-11-01
property without a warrant or permission. He also argues that the trial court’s rulings regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56188 - 2010-11-01
COURT OF APPEALS
the basis for the mistrial request is sufficiently prejudicial to warrant a new trial.” State v. Bunch, 191
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49473 - 2010-05-26
the basis for the mistrial request is sufficiently prejudicial to warrant a new trial.” State v. Bunch, 191
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49473 - 2010-05-26
State v. Jeffery L. Watson
, they would get a search warrant and beat down her door. She also contends that the officers became rude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13804 - 2005-03-31
, they would get a search warrant and beat down her door. She also contends that the officers became rude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13804 - 2005-03-31
Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. Charles Glynn
of discipline, arguing that the seriousness of the misconduct warrants a one-year license suspension. ¶2 We
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17314 - 2015-03-26
of discipline, arguing that the seriousness of the misconduct warrants a one-year license suspension. ¶2 We
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17314 - 2015-03-26
[PDF]
State v. Gregory J. Dull
with directions. Before Snyder, P.J., Brown and Anderson, JJ. BROWN, J. Without a warrant, and without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10981 - 2017-09-19
with directions. Before Snyder, P.J., Brown and Anderson, JJ. BROWN, J. Without a warrant, and without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10981 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
went to L.T.H.’s home to serve a warrant on her from the Wauwatosa Police Department, and found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=545050 - 2022-07-19
went to L.T.H.’s home to serve a warrant on her from the Wauwatosa Police Department, and found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=545050 - 2022-07-19
COURT OF APPEALS
that the legislature’s repeal of PAT warrants sentence modification and that the postconviction court erroneously denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134577 - 2015-02-09
that the legislature’s repeal of PAT warrants sentence modification and that the postconviction court erroneously denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134577 - 2015-02-09
[PDF]
2023 OWI Guidelines - District 9
FINE: $300 to $1000. JAIL: 5 days to 6 months. DISQUALIFICATION: 1 year (12 months.) DISCRETIONARY
/publications/fees/docs/d9owi2023.pdf?ver=1.1 - 2023-12-22
FINE: $300 to $1000. JAIL: 5 days to 6 months. DISQUALIFICATION: 1 year (12 months.) DISCRETIONARY
/publications/fees/docs/d9owi2023.pdf?ver=1.1 - 2023-12-22