Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9131 - 9140 of 50035 for our.
Search results 9131 - 9140 of 50035 for our.
CA Blank Order
sentencing discretion must overcome our presumption that the sentence was reasonable. State v. Ramuta, 2003
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104949 - 2013-11-25
sentencing discretion must overcome our presumption that the sentence was reasonable. State v. Ramuta, 2003
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104949 - 2013-11-25
COURT OF APPEALS
our attention to any submissions in that regard. ¶6 There may be arguments that the parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40640 - 2009-09-09
our attention to any submissions in that regard. ¶6 There may be arguments that the parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40640 - 2009-09-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that this is a discretionary decision on our part. See Raz v. Brown, 2003 WI 29, ¶14, 260 Wis. 2d 614, 660 N.W.2d 647. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=301110 - 2020-11-04
that this is a discretionary decision on our part. See Raz v. Brown, 2003 WI 29, ¶14, 260 Wis. 2d 614, 660 N.W.2d 647. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=301110 - 2020-11-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263119 - 2020-06-09
and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263119 - 2020-06-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
discretion must overcome our presumption that the court reasonably exercised its discretion. State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159817 - 2017-09-21
discretion must overcome our presumption that the court reasonably exercised its discretion. State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159817 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
from the judgment under Wis. Stat. § 806.07(1)(h) (2011-12).[1] Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95302 - 2013-04-08
from the judgment under Wis. Stat. § 806.07(1)(h) (2011-12).[1] Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95302 - 2013-04-08
[PDF]
NOTICE
supporting a conviction, we may not substitute our judgment for the jury’s “unless the evidence, viewed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63154 - 2014-09-15
supporting a conviction, we may not substitute our judgment for the jury’s “unless the evidence, viewed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63154 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and he has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=798545 - 2024-05-07
, and he has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=798545 - 2024-05-07
State v. Robert T. Langston
.[1] Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11319 - 2005-03-31
.[1] Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11319 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to sentencing following revocation. Our review of a sentence determination begins “with the presumption
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207414 - 2018-01-19
to sentencing following revocation. Our review of a sentence determination begins “with the presumption
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207414 - 2018-01-19