Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9141 - 9150 of 30120 for consulta de causas.
Search results 9141 - 9150 of 30120 for consulta de causas.
COURT OF APPEALS
de novo.” State v. Peralta, 2011 WI App 81, ¶16, Nos. 2010AP563-CR and 2010AP1334-CR. ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67959 - 2011-07-13
de novo.” State v. Peralta, 2011 WI App 81, ¶16, Nos. 2010AP563-CR and 2010AP1334-CR. ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67959 - 2011-07-13
COURT OF APPEALS
erroneous. Id. Second, we review questions of constitutional fact de novo. Id. ¶6 We begin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31823 - 2008-03-12
erroneous. Id. Second, we review questions of constitutional fact de novo. Id. ¶6 We begin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31823 - 2008-03-12
COURT OF APPEALS
standard of reasonableness is a question of law subject to de novo review by this court. Id. at 54, 556
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82117 - 2012-05-07
standard of reasonableness is a question of law subject to de novo review by this court. Id. at 54, 556
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82117 - 2012-05-07
Arnold E. Smith v. Douglas G. Slock
." It is from this ruling that Smith appeals. We review summary judgments de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10807 - 2005-03-31
." It is from this ruling that Smith appeals. We review summary judgments de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10807 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jacob W. Hatcher
decide de novo. Id. ¶9 An investigatory stop is a “seizure” for constitutional purposes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5746 - 2005-03-31
decide de novo. Id. ¶9 An investigatory stop is a “seizure” for constitutional purposes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5746 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
of a statute de novo. Id., ¶13. We perceive no error in the denial of Dunay’s petition. Insofar
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1020843 - 2025-10-08
of a statute de novo. Id., ¶13. We perceive no error in the denial of Dunay’s petition. Insofar
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1020843 - 2025-10-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that this court reviews de novo. State v. Edwards, 2003 WI 68, ¶7, 262 Wis. 2d 448, 665 N.W.2d 136. ¶7 In its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235606 - 2019-02-27
that this court reviews de novo. State v. Edwards, 2003 WI 68, ¶7, 262 Wis. 2d 448, 665 N.W.2d 136. ¶7 In its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235606 - 2019-02-27
[PDF]
State v. Darren E. Brookins
, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law to be reviewed de novo. Id. If the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20585 - 2017-09-21
, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law to be reviewed de novo. Id. If the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20585 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. When a defendant fails to prove either prong
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157368 - 2017-09-21
is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. When a defendant fails to prove either prong
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157368 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is a question of law that this court reviews de novo.” State v. Henning, 2004 WI 89, ¶14, 273 Wis. 2d 352
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214284 - 2018-06-13
is a question of law that this court reviews de novo.” State v. Henning, 2004 WI 89, ¶14, 273 Wis. 2d 352
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214284 - 2018-06-13