Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9141 - 9150 of 63537 for records.
Search results 9141 - 9150 of 63537 for records.
[PDF]
State v. Robert A. Ruzkowski
thus erroneously considered facts outside the record and sentenced him based upon inaccurate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20279 - 2017-09-21
thus erroneously considered facts outside the record and sentenced him based upon inaccurate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20279 - 2017-09-21
State v. Thomas K. Malmquist
] Thus, in the first place, nothing in the record documents the substance of the officers' hallway
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11575 - 2005-03-31
] Thus, in the first place, nothing in the record documents the substance of the officers' hallway
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11575 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a response. Based upon our independent review of the record and the no-merit report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243061 - 2019-06-28
a response. Based upon our independent review of the record and the no-merit report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243061 - 2019-06-28
CA Blank Order
. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, response, and supplement, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101616 - 2013-09-02
. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, response, and supplement, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101616 - 2013-09-02
COURT OF APPEALS
report. Following our independent review of the record, we affirmed the judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29964 - 2007-08-13
report. Following our independent review of the record, we affirmed the judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29964 - 2007-08-13
CA Blank Order
considering the no-merit report and the response, and after conducting an independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139181 - 2015-04-01
considering the no-merit report and the response, and after conducting an independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139181 - 2015-04-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, but he has not filed a response. Having independently reviewed the entire record as mandated by Anders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=756697 - 2024-02-01
, but he has not filed a response. Having independently reviewed the entire record as mandated by Anders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=756697 - 2024-02-01
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we conclude there is no arguable merit to any issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1065791 - 2026-01-21
of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we conclude there is no arguable merit to any issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1065791 - 2026-01-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, but he has not filed a response. Having independently reviewed the entire record as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=756697 - 2024-02-01
, but he has not filed a response. Having independently reviewed the entire record as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=756697 - 2024-02-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, was advised of his right to file a response, and has responded. We have independently reviewed the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=863478 - 2024-10-22
, was advised of his right to file a response, and has responded. We have independently reviewed the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=863478 - 2024-10-22