Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9141 - 9150 of 83380 for simple case search.
Search results 9141 - 9150 of 83380 for simple case search.
State v. Jason L. Wendler
to suppress the test result as violations of his Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable searches
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5739 - 2005-03-31
to suppress the test result as violations of his Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable searches
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5739 - 2005-03-31
State v. Thomas L. Salzwedel
searches and seizures. He contended a warrant was needed for the blood draw and that the implied consent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5703 - 2005-03-31
searches and seizures. He contended a warrant was needed for the blood draw and that the implied consent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5703 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jimmy Sloan
(..continued) Any person claiming the right to possession of property seized pursuant to a search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9183 - 2017-09-19
(..continued) Any person claiming the right to possession of property seized pursuant to a search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9183 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Mark A. Johnson
. STAT. § 343.305 punished him for exercising his right not to consent to searches and seizures under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5510 - 2017-09-19
. STAT. § 343.305 punished him for exercising his right not to consent to searches and seizures under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5510 - 2017-09-19
State v. Joseph M. Meicher
, a search warrant was needed to analyze his blood sample. We disagree and affirm.[2] Background ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5276 - 2005-03-31
, a search warrant was needed to analyze his blood sample. We disagree and affirm.[2] Background ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5276 - 2005-03-31
State v. Mark A. Johnson
the revocation. He argued Wis. Stat. § 343.305 punished him for exercising his right not to consent to searches
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5510 - 2005-03-31
the revocation. He argued Wis. Stat. § 343.305 punished him for exercising his right not to consent to searches
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5510 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Joseph M. Meicher
law unconstitutionally coerces consent, and (2) without consent, a search warrant was needed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5276 - 2017-09-19
law unconstitutionally coerces consent, and (2) without consent, a search warrant was needed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5276 - 2017-09-19
State v. Jimmy Sloan
to possession of property seized pursuant to a search warrant or seized without a search warrant may apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9183 - 2014-05-08
to possession of property seized pursuant to a search warrant or seized without a search warrant may apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9183 - 2014-05-08
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
at conference that this case is appropriate No. 2024AP722 2 for summary disposition. See WIS
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1072477 - 2026-02-04
at conference that this case is appropriate No. 2024AP722 2 for summary disposition. See WIS
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1072477 - 2026-02-04
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
at conference that this case is appropriate No. 2024AP722 2 for summary disposition. See WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1072477 - 2026-02-04
at conference that this case is appropriate No. 2024AP722 2 for summary disposition. See WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1072477 - 2026-02-04