Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9141 - 9150 of 83771 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 9141 - 9150 of 83771 for simple case search/1000.
[PDF]
State v. David J.M.
of the evidence.2 We next address David’s contention that he was unlawfully searched. While Christensen’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13881 - 2014-09-15
of the evidence.2 We next address David’s contention that he was unlawfully searched. While Christensen’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13881 - 2014-09-15
State v. Dwayne Williams
to suppress the fruits of the search, arguing that Montgomery lacked probable cause to believe he was carrying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11507 - 2005-03-31
to suppress the fruits of the search, arguing that Montgomery lacked probable cause to believe he was carrying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11507 - 2005-03-31
State v. David J.M.
.[2] We next address David’s contention that he was unlawfully searched
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13881 - 2005-03-31
.[2] We next address David’s contention that he was unlawfully searched
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13881 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Orville Oney v. Leroy Nennig, Jr.
with another Sheboygan County sheriff's detective and a probation officer, searched Oney's house pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8220 - 2017-09-19
with another Sheboygan County sheriff's detective and a probation officer, searched Oney's house pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8220 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey L. Meyers
to §§ 161.41(1m)(h)1 and 939.05, STATS. Meyers contends that the warrantless search of the van he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8910 - 2017-09-19
to §§ 161.41(1m)(h)1 and 939.05, STATS. Meyers contends that the warrantless search of the van he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8910 - 2017-09-19
State v. Jeffrey L. Meyers
to a crime, contrary to §§ 161.41(1m)(h)1 and 939.05, Stats. Meyers contends that the warrantless search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8910 - 2005-03-31
to a crime, contrary to §§ 161.41(1m)(h)1 and 939.05, Stats. Meyers contends that the warrantless search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8910 - 2005-03-31
Orville Oney v. Leroy Nennig, Jr.
, searched Oney's house pursuant to a search warrant. Various items were seized during the search. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8220 - 2005-03-31
, searched Oney's house pursuant to a search warrant. Various items were seized during the search. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8220 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jon A. York
claims that: (1) the affidavit in support of the search warrant did not establish probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5157 - 2017-09-19
claims that: (1) the affidavit in support of the search warrant did not establish probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5157 - 2017-09-19
State v. Jon A. York
to suppress because he claims that: (1) the affidavit in support of the search warrant did not establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5157 - 2005-03-31
to suppress because he claims that: (1) the affidavit in support of the search warrant did not establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5157 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Lamont Caldwell
illegal entry and search. We conclude that trial counsel waived his objection to admission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7688 - 2017-09-19
illegal entry and search. We conclude that trial counsel waived his objection to admission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7688 - 2017-09-19