Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9151 - 9160 of 63360 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 9151 - 9160 of 63360 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
NOTICE
in accordance with WIS. STAT. [RULE] 809.30(2)(i),” denying postconviction motions that previously had been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62866 - 2014-09-15
in accordance with WIS. STAT. [RULE] 809.30(2)(i),” denying postconviction motions that previously had been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62866 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
with Wis. Stat. [Rule] 809.30(2)(i),” denying postconviction motions that previously had been filed by him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62866 - 2012-04-19
with Wis. Stat. [Rule] 809.30(2)(i),” denying postconviction motions that previously had been filed by him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62866 - 2012-04-19
State v. Andrew James Garner
motion. He argues that the trial court violated his right to due process of law by denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10264 - 2005-03-31
motion. He argues that the trial court violated his right to due process of law by denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10264 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Andrew James Garner
of burglarious tools, and from the trial court's order denying his postconviction motion. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10264 - 2017-09-20
of burglarious tools, and from the trial court's order denying his postconviction motion. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10264 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
suppression motion should have been granted. We reject his suppression argument. ¶2 Huff also appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85492 - 2014-09-15
suppression motion should have been granted. We reject his suppression argument. ¶2 Huff also appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85492 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
of cocaine, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 961.41(1m)(cm)4. (2009-10).[1] Huff argues that his suppression motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85492 - 2012-07-30
of cocaine, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 961.41(1m)(cm)4. (2009-10).[1] Huff argues that his suppression motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85492 - 2012-07-30
[PDF]
NOTICE
2 erroneously granted the guardian ad litem’s motion for partial summary judgment on the ground
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34738 - 2014-09-15
2 erroneously granted the guardian ad litem’s motion for partial summary judgment on the ground
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34738 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
unsuccessful pro se postconviction motions seeking sentence modification. This court has considered
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102185 - 2013-09-18
unsuccessful pro se postconviction motions seeking sentence modification. This court has considered
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102185 - 2013-09-18
COURT OF APPEALS
the guardian ad litem’s motion for partial summary judgment on the ground of failure to assume parental
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34738 - 2008-11-25
the guardian ad litem’s motion for partial summary judgment on the ground of failure to assume parental
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34738 - 2008-11-25
[PDF]
State v. Raymond L. Matzker
motion for a new trial based on ineffective assistance of trial counsel (court of appeals case No. 95
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10096 - 2017-09-19
motion for a new trial based on ineffective assistance of trial counsel (court of appeals case No. 95
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10096 - 2017-09-19