Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9151 - 9160 of 58546 for speedy trial.
Search results 9151 - 9160 of 58546 for speedy trial.
State v. Thomas W. Reimann
(a) the statute allowing one-party-consent conversations into evidence, enacted before trial but after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8133 - 2005-03-31
(a) the statute allowing one-party-consent conversations into evidence, enacted before trial but after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8133 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Thomas W. Reimann
trial but after the recordings were made, cannot be applied retroactively and, alternatively, (b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8133 - 2017-09-19
trial but after the recordings were made, cannot be applied retroactively and, alternatively, (b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8133 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Edward F. Topping
for postconviction relief. He makes these claims on appeal: (1) the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3633 - 2017-09-19
for postconviction relief. He makes these claims on appeal: (1) the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3633 - 2017-09-19
State v. Thomas W. Reimann
(a) the statute allowing one-party-consent conversations into evidence, enacted before trial but after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8132 - 2005-03-31
(a) the statute allowing one-party-consent conversations into evidence, enacted before trial but after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8132 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Thomas W. Reimann
trial but after the recordings were made, cannot be applied retroactively and, alternatively, (b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8132 - 2017-09-19
trial but after the recordings were made, cannot be applied retroactively and, alternatively, (b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8132 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. On appeal, the City argues that the trial court erred in denying its summary judgment motion and instead
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179603 - 2017-09-21
. On appeal, the City argues that the trial court erred in denying its summary judgment motion and instead
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179603 - 2017-09-21
State v. Ronald J. Zanelli
. Ronald Zanelli appeals from an order, following a jury trial, requiring his civil commitment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13743 - 2005-03-31
. Ronald Zanelli appeals from an order, following a jury trial, requiring his civil commitment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13743 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Pinnacle Construction, LLC (“MPC”) appeals a judgment entered following a trial in which the jury found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=588599 - 2022-11-10
Pinnacle Construction, LLC (“MPC”) appeals a judgment entered following a trial in which the jury found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=588599 - 2022-11-10
State v. Steven Saivong
for postconviction relief.[1] Saivong argues: (1) the trial court improperly exercised its discretion when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9028 - 2005-03-31
for postconviction relief.[1] Saivong argues: (1) the trial court improperly exercised its discretion when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9028 - 2005-03-31
State v. Perry Monroe, Jr.
a five-year prison term. The presentence investigation report recommended probation. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13645 - 2005-03-31
a five-year prison term. The presentence investigation report recommended probation. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13645 - 2005-03-31