Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9161 - 9170 of 43531 for WA 0852 2611 9277 Jasa Pemasangan Interior Set Kamar Ukiran Apartemen Saffron Noble Bogor.
Search results 9161 - 9170 of 43531 for WA 0852 2611 9277 Jasa Pemasangan Interior Set Kamar Ukiran Apartemen Saffron Noble Bogor.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
plea was not knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily entered. For the reasons set forth below
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=572370 - 2022-10-04
plea was not knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily entered. For the reasons set forth below
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=572370 - 2022-10-04
[PDF]
Christine Whiting v. Hartford Casualty Ins. Co.
. II. This case involves the application of § 102.29(1), STATS., to a set of undisputed facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13949 - 2014-09-15
. II. This case involves the application of § 102.29(1), STATS., to a set of undisputed facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13949 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Michael D. Gregory, Jr. v. Samuel Webster
] [f]indings of fact shall not be set aside unless clearly erroneous….”).4 ¶6 Next, Webster
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5028 - 2017-09-19
] [f]indings of fact shall not be set aside unless clearly erroneous….”).4 ¶6 Next, Webster
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5028 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
., ¶17. ¶8 WISCONSIN ADMIN. CODE § DOC 328.21(7) (Dec. 2006) sets out factors to be considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97608 - 2014-09-15
., ¶17. ¶8 WISCONSIN ADMIN. CODE § DOC 328.21(7) (Dec. 2006) sets out factors to be considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97608 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that Miller “does not apply to [Hampton’s] case because a parole eligibility date was set in his case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=127949 - 2017-09-21
that Miller “does not apply to [Hampton’s] case because a parole eligibility date was set in his case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=127949 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
awarded to the [father] as to be set forth herein. The parties specifically agree that in the event
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=463509 - 2021-12-22
awarded to the [father] as to be set forth herein. The parties specifically agree that in the event
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=463509 - 2021-12-22
[PDF]
State v. Oscar Jasper
have been in the county where bail was set and the trial No(s). 00-1943-CR 2 court lacked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2824 - 2017-09-19
have been in the county where bail was set and the trial No(s). 00-1943-CR 2 court lacked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2824 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
factor is “a fact or set of facts highly relevant to the imposition of sentence, but not known
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206951 - 2018-01-17
factor is “a fact or set of facts highly relevant to the imposition of sentence, but not known
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206951 - 2018-01-17
COURT OF APPEALS
A “new factor” is a fact or set of facts highly relevant to the defendant’s sentence that was unknown
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49234 - 2010-04-21
A “new factor” is a fact or set of facts highly relevant to the defendant’s sentence that was unknown
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49234 - 2010-04-21
COURT OF APPEALS
the existence of a new factor. Whether the fact or set of facts put forth by the defendant constitutes a “new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72642 - 2011-10-24
the existence of a new factor. Whether the fact or set of facts put forth by the defendant constitutes a “new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72642 - 2011-10-24