Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9161 - 9170 of 83284 for case search.
Search results 9161 - 9170 of 83284 for case search.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
imposed, ‘we are obliged to search the record to determine whether in the exercise of proper
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145097 - 2017-09-21
imposed, ‘we are obliged to search the record to determine whether in the exercise of proper
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145097 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
David Ott v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
.2d 222 (1978). This court’s role is to search the record to locate credible evidence that supports
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7169 - 2017-09-20
.2d 222 (1978). This court’s role is to search the record to locate credible evidence that supports
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7169 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. James R. Walz
. 4 The wording of the search and seizure section of the Wisconsin Constitution is nearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6715 - 2017-09-20
. 4 The wording of the search and seizure section of the Wisconsin Constitution is nearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6715 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Constitution, “all searches and seizures [must] be objectively reasonable under the circumstances existing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85795 - 2014-09-15
Constitution, “all searches and seizures [must] be objectively reasonable under the circumstances existing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85795 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
in this case. We reject Faulkner’s double jeopardy argument. ¶9 In the alternative, Faulkner contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144469 - 2015-07-20
in this case. We reject Faulkner’s double jeopardy argument. ¶9 In the alternative, Faulkner contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144469 - 2015-07-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
retrial after a successful appeal applies in this case. We reject Faulkner’s double jeopardy argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144469 - 2017-09-21
retrial after a successful appeal applies in this case. We reject Faulkner’s double jeopardy argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144469 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
stopped vehicles when he received that response, and in those cases “it actually has been mistakes made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172800 - 2017-09-21
stopped vehicles when he received that response, and in those cases “it actually has been mistakes made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172800 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
“fails to specifically set forth the reasons for the sentence imposed, ‘we are obliged to search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145097 - 2015-07-27
“fails to specifically set forth the reasons for the sentence imposed, ‘we are obliged to search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145097 - 2015-07-27
[PDF]
NOTICE
that she did not go armed with a concealed and dangerous weapon. The undisputed facts of this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32273 - 2014-09-15
that she did not go armed with a concealed and dangerous weapon. The undisputed facts of this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32273 - 2014-09-15
07AP2440 State v. Caprice S.I.doc
. The undisputed facts of this case establish that a dangerous weapon, a padlock with a shoestring attached
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32273 - 2008-04-01
. The undisputed facts of this case establish that a dangerous weapon, a padlock with a shoestring attached
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32273 - 2008-04-01