Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9161 - 9170 of 16449 for commentating.

State v. Douglas E. Fitch
because the court commented that “[t]here is a heavier burden to withdraw a plea when we are dealing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4719 - 2008-09-28

COURT OF APPEALS
advised him that she could ensure his issues were preserved for appeal, and we do not read her comments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61922 - 2010-03-29

Shannon Jeanne Krug v. Theodore Richard Krug
comment on Brien’s supplemental answers. Although counsel for Shannon informed the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19033 - 2005-07-19

Daniel Harr v. Daniel Bertrand
violated, and the committee took Dr. Wellens’ comments into account. The warden had no involvement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4267 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
, but it doesn’t absolve the punitive component of the contempt finding today.” We read the court’s comment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35671 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
.2d 738 (Ct. App. 1984). Here, the record shows that Jackson was afforded an opportunity to comment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160446 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
to comment on the presentence investigation report, and to address the court, both personally and through
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175448 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. 1984). The record shows that Roberts was afforded an opportunity to comment on the presentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206781 - 2018-01-08

[PDF] NOTICE
his issues were preserved for appeal, and we do not read her comments to the court as anything
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61922 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Robert J. Pallone
at the officer and the duffel bag. Pallone commented that he wished to remove 3
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17382 - 2017-09-21