Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9161 - 9170 of 30126 for consulta de causas.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, is de novo. State v. Powers, 2004 WI App 143, ¶6, 275 Wis. 2d 456, 462, 685 N.W.2d 869. ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83070 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that this court reviews de novo. State v. Edwards, 2003 WI 68, ¶7, 262 Wis. 2d 448, 665 N.W.2d 136. ¶7 In its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235606 - 2019-02-27

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
2016 status report from Dr. Raul de Jesus addressing Bosin’s status at WMHI and her progress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210893 - 2018-04-11

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
they are clearly erroneous. See State v. Carter, 2010 WI 40, ¶19, 324 Wis. 2d 640, 782 N.W.2d 695. We review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217987 - 2018-08-21

[PDF] State v. Kenneth L. Champion
meets this test is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. at 310. Nos. 00-2998 01
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3488 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Leonard Jones v. Leon Kruchten, Sr.
was originally tried before a court commissioner. Tenant then requested a trial de novo under § 799.207(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14326 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
particular case presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Tolefree, 209 Wis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=348785 - 2021-03-30

Lutheran Church Extension Fund - Missouri Synod v. Epiphany Lutheran Church
When reviewing a summary judgment, we perform the same function as the trial court and our review is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3718 - 2005-03-31

Pell Lake Sanitary District No. 1 v. Vicki View
and the application of a statute to specific facts are questions of law that we review de novo. Garcia v. Mazda Motor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19352 - 2005-08-23

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
reviews de novo. Id., ¶33. ¶9 We conclude that the facts alleged by Miskowski do not constitute a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108113 - 2017-09-21