Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9161 - 9170 of 68499 for did.
Search results 9161 - 9170 of 68499 for did.
[PDF]
State v. Mark T. Smith
of law. The case you litigated in this court was a burglary charge. It did not involve any kind
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6931 - 2017-09-20
of law. The case you litigated in this court was a burglary charge. It did not involve any kind
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6931 - 2017-09-20
David C. v. Milwaukee County Department of Human Services
that it was in the children's best interests to change placement to the relative's home; and (2) they did not receive a fair
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9166 - 2005-03-31
that it was in the children's best interests to change placement to the relative's home; and (2) they did not receive a fair
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9166 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
because she did not believe that J.W. had sexually assaulted her daughter.3 ¶5 J.W. was charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259964 - 2020-05-12
because she did not believe that J.W. had sexually assaulted her daughter.3 ¶5 J.W. was charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259964 - 2020-05-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the policy of insurance it issued to Robert Schneider DBA Gravity Park USA, LLC,2 did not provide coverage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=938335 - 2025-04-08
that the policy of insurance it issued to Robert Schneider DBA Gravity Park USA, LLC,2 did not provide coverage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=938335 - 2025-04-08
State v. Thomas M. Stockland
that he did, in fact, have four prior convictions counted as penalty enhancers under Wis. Stat. § 343.307
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5541 - 2005-03-31
that he did, in fact, have four prior convictions counted as penalty enhancers under Wis. Stat. § 343.307
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5541 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jesus Barbary
did not erroneously exercise its discretion in failing to appoint counsel at the county’s expense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11590 - 2005-03-31
did not erroneously exercise its discretion in failing to appoint counsel at the county’s expense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11590 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Mario D. Tye
his plea on the ground that he did not understand he could be found guilty of a lesser-included
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20594 - 2017-09-21
his plea on the ground that he did not understand he could be found guilty of a lesser-included
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20594 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Losse initially testified that he and Carolina had discussed Carolina’s charges, but he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=498468 - 2022-03-22
. Losse initially testified that he and Carolina had discussed Carolina’s charges, but he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=498468 - 2022-03-22
EPF Corporation v. Roger C. Pfost
judgments.[3] It did not address the judgments in favor of the Tiedes or Associated Milk Producers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10192 - 2005-03-31
judgments.[3] It did not address the judgments in favor of the Tiedes or Associated Milk Producers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10192 - 2005-03-31
State v. John R. Maloney
the convictions. ¶6 Although the jury did not need to find proof of motive, it was instructed that “motive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16233 - 2005-03-31
the convictions. ¶6 Although the jury did not need to find proof of motive, it was instructed that “motive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16233 - 2005-03-31