Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9161 - 9170 of 24568 for extending.
Search results 9161 - 9170 of 24568 for extending.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of extended supervision. We affirm. ¶2 When sentencing a defendant, the circuit court must consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74796 - 2014-09-15
of extended supervision. We affirm. ¶2 When sentencing a defendant, the circuit court must consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74796 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
. Stat. § 808.04(1). We cannot extend that time. Wis. Stat. Rule 809.82(2). An appeal from a final
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131172 - 2014-11-30
. Stat. § 808.04(1). We cannot extend that time. Wis. Stat. Rule 809.82(2). An appeal from a final
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131172 - 2014-11-30
CA Blank Order
confinement followed by three years of extended supervision. Hewitt filed a postconviction motion to vacate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112904 - 2014-05-27
confinement followed by three years of extended supervision. Hewitt filed a postconviction motion to vacate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112904 - 2014-05-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
confinement and three years of extended supervision. The no-merit report addresses whether the evidence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=293193 - 2020-10-01
confinement and three years of extended supervision. The no-merit report addresses whether the evidence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=293193 - 2020-10-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of extended supervision for substantial battery and a consecutive nine-month term for assault by a prisoner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132839 - 2017-09-21
of extended supervision for substantial battery and a consecutive nine-month term for assault by a prisoner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132839 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
confinement and twenty months’ extended supervision and placed Reynosa on three years’ probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172704 - 2017-09-21
confinement and twenty months’ extended supervision and placed Reynosa on three years’ probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172704 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and three years of extended supervision. It also ordered a fine of $1200. These no-merit appeals follow
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231733 - 2019-01-09
and three years of extended supervision. It also ordered a fine of $1200. These no-merit appeals follow
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231733 - 2019-01-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of extended supervision, consecutive to other sentences he was serving. This no-merit appeal follows
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=783303 - 2024-04-03
of extended supervision, consecutive to other sentences he was serving. This no-merit appeal follows
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=783303 - 2024-04-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
confinement and eight years of extended supervision. Prior to entering his pleas, Howard moved to suppress
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=711426 - 2023-10-11
confinement and eight years of extended supervision. Prior to entering his pleas, Howard moved to suppress
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=711426 - 2023-10-11
[PDF]
Irma T. Wiedmeyer v. Doris E. Carriveau
that Wiedmeyer had not complied with her discovery demand. On February 20, 1998, Wiedmeyer moved to extend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14009 - 2014-09-15
that Wiedmeyer had not complied with her discovery demand. On February 20, 1998, Wiedmeyer moved to extend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14009 - 2014-09-15