Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9161 - 9170 of 24568 for extending.
Search results 9161 - 9170 of 24568 for extending.
George Huxhold v. John Joseph Campbell
real estate development. The parties signed the contract in February 1999. It extended until December
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6618 - 2005-03-31
real estate development. The parties signed the contract in February 1999. It extended until December
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6618 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
confinement and five years’ extended supervision. As the no-merit report acknowledges, an appeal from
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=254999 - 2020-02-25
confinement and five years’ extended supervision. As the no-merit report acknowledges, an appeal from
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=254999 - 2020-02-25
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
, the circuit court imposed a sentence consisting of five years’ initial confinement and five years’ extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94518 - 2014-09-15
, the circuit court imposed a sentence consisting of five years’ initial confinement and five years’ extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94518 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of initial confinement and two years of extended supervision. This appeal from the sentence following
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=478690 - 2022-02-03
of initial confinement and two years of extended supervision. This appeal from the sentence following
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=478690 - 2022-02-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to four years’ initial confinement and six years’ extended supervision. This no-merit appeal followed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161598 - 2017-09-21
to four years’ initial confinement and six years’ extended supervision. This no-merit appeal followed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161598 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of four years’ initial confinement followed by five years’ extended supervision on the count of causing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=597920 - 2022-12-06
of four years’ initial confinement followed by five years’ extended supervision on the count of causing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=597920 - 2022-12-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
confinement and six years of extended supervision. This no-merit report follows. Appellate counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1051789 - 2025-12-23
confinement and six years of extended supervision. This no-merit report follows. Appellate counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1051789 - 2025-12-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
years of extended supervision, consecutive to existing sentences. On the second count, the court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1027136 - 2025-10-23
years of extended supervision, consecutive to existing sentences. On the second count, the court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1027136 - 2025-10-23
Mike Maes Construction, Inc. v. Francis Grady
of the purpose of Wis. Stat. § 102.07(8) to extend protection to independent contractors “except in those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16031 - 2005-03-31
of the purpose of Wis. Stat. § 102.07(8) to extend protection to independent contractors “except in those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16031 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of initial confinement and ten years of extended supervision for the two crimes. The circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=336738 - 2021-02-23
of initial confinement and ten years of extended supervision for the two crimes. The circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=336738 - 2021-02-23