Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9171 - 9180 of 30126 for consulta de causas.

[PDF] State v. Richard T.
erroneous” standard in a termination-of-parental-rights case). We review de novo whether the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20792 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
de novo using the same methodology as the circuit court. Blum v. 1st Auto & Cas. Ins. Co., 2010
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74616 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] West Milwaukee East Development, Inc. v. West Milwaukee Village
a party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Id. Questions of law are reviewed de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11110 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
. This presents a question of “constitutional fact” that is reviewed de novo. State v. Jensen, 2007 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46366 - 2014-09-15

[PDF]
. Winnig filed a demand for a trial before the circuit court, which he titled “request for hearing de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=395932 - 2021-07-22

[PDF] Leonard Jones v. Leon Kruchten, Sr.
was originally tried before a court commissioner. Tenant then requested a trial de novo under § 799.207(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14326 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] County of Dunn v. Gerald J. Trainor
of law subject to de novo review. Id. No. 01-0474 4 ¶8 There is no question that a police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3631 - 2017-09-19

Kelly Lonergan v. Employers Mutual Casualty
protectable interest is a question of law that we review de novo. See id., 112 Wis. 2d at 549, 334 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26313 - 2006-08-28

COURT OF APPEALS
to Chase. Braun appeals. ¶6 We review summary judgments de novo, using the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131638 - 2014-12-15

State v. Michael A. Marshalek
. In addition, the legality of a traffic stop is a question of law we also review de novo. State v. Baudhuin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4219 - 2005-03-31