Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9181 - 9190 of 63539 for records.
Search results 9181 - 9190 of 63539 for records.
[PDF]
State v. Robert N. Kroeplin
. ¶6 Kroeplin’s argument supporting the trial court’s decision overstates the record. Kroeplin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6729 - 2017-09-20
. ¶6 Kroeplin’s argument supporting the trial court’s decision overstates the record. Kroeplin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6729 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the prima facie fact language gets in. The court disagreed stating, “I think that the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=295395 - 2020-10-14
the prima facie fact language gets in. The court disagreed stating, “I think that the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=295395 - 2020-10-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, or if the record conclusively demonstrates that the defendant is not entitled to relief, the circuit court may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=221851 - 2018-10-17
, or if the record conclusively demonstrates that the defendant is not entitled to relief, the circuit court may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=221851 - 2018-10-17
COURT OF APPEALS
not receive documents, the court determined that there was no proof in the certiorari record that Henderson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49547 - 2010-05-04
not receive documents, the court determined that there was no proof in the certiorari record that Henderson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49547 - 2010-05-04
COURT OF APPEALS
is not the equivalent of unfettered decision making, but is to be made based upon the facts appearing in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109783 - 2014-04-01
is not the equivalent of unfettered decision making, but is to be made based upon the facts appearing in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109783 - 2014-04-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a response, but he did not do so. Upon this court’s independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1038075 - 2025-11-18
a response, but he did not do so. Upon this court’s independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1038075 - 2025-11-18
State v. Henry Bloomfield
to present evidence relevant to his defense. Because the record fails to demonstrate prejudice, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5636 - 2005-03-31
to present evidence relevant to his defense. Because the record fails to demonstrate prejudice, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5636 - 2005-03-31
State v. Terry L. Bankhead
an extensive response. After an independent review of the appellate record as mandated by Anders, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7685 - 2005-03-31
an extensive response. After an independent review of the appellate record as mandated by Anders, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7685 - 2005-03-31
Department of Natural Resources v. Bruce D. Bowden
, personally or by a deputy, a record, in books or on drawings and plats that are kept for that purpose, of all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4508 - 2005-03-31
, personally or by a deputy, a record, in books or on drawings and plats that are kept for that purpose, of all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4508 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
has the burden to show some unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record for the sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37917 - 2009-07-20
has the burden to show some unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record for the sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37917 - 2009-07-20