Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9191 - 9200 of 24568 for extending.
Search results 9191 - 9200 of 24568 for extending.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
charge and was sentenced to seven years’ incarceration and twelve years’ extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185766 - 2017-09-21
charge and was sentenced to seven years’ incarceration and twelve years’ extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185766 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
. The circuit court sentenced him to ten years of initial confinement followed by eight years of extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133571 - 2015-01-27
. The circuit court sentenced him to ten years of initial confinement followed by eight years of extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133571 - 2015-01-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
by three years of extended supervision. The sentences were ordered to run consecutive to each other
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=353309 - 2021-04-07
by three years of extended supervision. The sentences were ordered to run consecutive to each other
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=353309 - 2021-04-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of extended supervision. This no-merit appeal follows. The no-merit report addresses whether Hook’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166971 - 2017-09-21
of extended supervision. This no-merit appeal follows. The no-merit report addresses whether Hook’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166971 - 2017-09-21
Randall Scott Grobe v. Judy M. Grobe
, the parties stipulated to extending the $1000 family maintenance payments until August 1985. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8057 - 2005-03-31
, the parties stipulated to extending the $1000 family maintenance payments until August 1985. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8057 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to four years’ initial confinement and six years’ extended supervision. This no-merit appeal followed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161598 - 2017-09-21
to four years’ initial confinement and six years’ extended supervision. This no-merit appeal followed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161598 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of four years’ initial confinement followed by five years’ extended supervision on the count of causing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=597920 - 2022-12-06
of four years’ initial confinement followed by five years’ extended supervision on the count of causing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=597920 - 2022-12-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
confinement and six years of extended supervision. This no-merit report follows. Appellate counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1051789 - 2025-12-23
confinement and six years of extended supervision. This no-merit report follows. Appellate counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1051789 - 2025-12-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
years of extended supervision, consecutive to existing sentences. On the second count, the court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1027136 - 2025-10-23
years of extended supervision, consecutive to existing sentences. On the second count, the court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1027136 - 2025-10-23
Mike Maes Construction, Inc. v. Francis Grady
of the purpose of Wis. Stat. § 102.07(8) to extend protection to independent contractors “except in those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16031 - 2005-03-31
of the purpose of Wis. Stat. § 102.07(8) to extend protection to independent contractors “except in those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16031 - 2005-03-31