Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 921 - 930 of 2830 for et.

[PDF] Response Brief (Citizen Mathematicians)
Citizen Mathematicians and Scientists Gary Krenz, et al. i
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/respbriefcitizenmath.pdf - 2021-11-01

[PDF] The 10 essential elements of opioid intervention courts
the likelihood of program success. See Michael Rempel, et al., Conclusions: The New York State Adult Drug Court
/courts/programs/problemsolving/docs/opioidessentialelements.pdf - 2021-09-29

[PDF] 2023AP001399 - Amicus Brief of Professor Charles Fried in Support of Petitioners
.................................................................................... 2, 4, 12 SECONDARY SOURCES Miriam Seifter, et al., The Democracy Principle in State
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_0822amicusbrief.pdf - 2023-10-16

State v. Robert John Prihoda
. Moore et al., Moore's Federal Practice § 636.02 (3d ed. 2000). It may not be easy to determine whether
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17420 - 2005-03-31

State v. Alan L. Radke
recidivist rate. See V.L. Quinsey, et. al, Actuarial Prediction of Sexual Recidivism, 10 J. Interpersonal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4174 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Robert John Prihoda
or action by the court . . . ." 6 James Wm. Moore et al., Moore's Federal Practice § 636.02 (3d ed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17420 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Alan L. Radke
. See V.L. Quinsey, et. al, Actuarial Prediction of Sexual Recidivism, 10 J. INTERPERSONAL VIOLENCE 85
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4174 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Oral Argument Synopses - September 2009
Carroll FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 18, 2009 9:45 a.m. 08AP10 - Mark J. Solowicz, et al. v. Forward Geneva
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40661 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Trent N.
or guardians are 1 20 U.S.C. 1400 et seq. Nos. 96-2327
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11266 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Thomas J. Kuklinski v. Humberto A. Rodriguez, M.D.
.2d 782, 790, 412 N.W.2d 155, 158 (Ct. App. 1987); 8 CHARLES A. WRIGHT ET AL., FEDERAL PRACTICE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9467 - 2017-09-19