Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 921 - 930 of 13452 for harm.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
convicting him of physical abuse of a child by recklessly causing great bodily harm, as a repeater. His
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=631938 - 2023-03-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
is that there is a “risk of harm to the witness if the witness testifies.” Brown argues that for Shingleton to appear
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166798 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of harm to [Lattimore] was lawful. You must consider the law of self-defense in deciding whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=708207 - 2023-10-03

[PDF] Supreme Court rule petition 21-04 - Appendix C
. To prevent physical harm to the juvenile or another person; ii. The juvenile has a history of disruptive
/supreme/docs/2104appc.pdf - 2021-09-14

State v. Thomas B. Brulport
created an unreasonable and substantial risk of death or great bodily harm or that he was aware
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9228 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that by damaging the furnace, it caused a substantial risk of great bodily harm, and, unfortunately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=300018 - 2020-10-29

WI App 98 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP1776-CR Complete Title...
and reasoned that the proper charge, given the facts presented, was a charge of exposing a child to harmful
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99397 - 2013-08-29

COURT OF APPEALS
risk of death or great bodily harm under circumstances which showed utter disregard for human life
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67962 - 2011-07-19

COURT OF APPEALS
be harmful. Testifying in court could be retraumatizing. Having to verbalize their answers of detaching
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54839 - 2010-09-27

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. will cause himself harm is supported by the evidence. Arguments asserted by the appellant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=293074 - 2020-10-01