Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 921 - 930 of 26464 for marital settlement agreement/1000.

State v. David A. Kelly
Kelly with causing more than $1000 damage to property, a Class D felony. See § 943.01(1) and (2)(d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7764 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Jerry J. Garceau v. Brenda S. Garceau
of the marital estate. Unlike a No. 98-3241 2 pension, the plan does not set money aside in a pool
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14776 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
from that portion of a judgment of divorce that divided marital property. Jerry argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60268 - 2011-02-23

[PDF] NOTICE
that portion of a judgment of divorce that divided marital property. Jerry argues that the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60268 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Kurt Van Engel Commission Co., Inc. v. Ann Jennaro Zingale
. She also argues that the trial court misapplied the Wisconsin Marital Property Act in reaching its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7594 - 2017-09-19

Kurt Van Engel Commission Co., Inc. v. Ann Jennaro Zingale
Marital Property Act in reaching its decision. ¶2 We conclude that Van Engel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7594 - 2005-03-31

Amy Rumpff v. Timothy Earl Rumpff
argues that he contributed $12,000 from a previous divorce settlement to improve the marital residence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6935 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Amy Rumpff v. Timothy Earl Rumpff
settlement to improve the marital residence and that the property division should reflect his contribution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6935 - 2017-09-20

2010 WI APP 78
court’s order, arguing that the remand court erred by reducing the child support owed to the two marital
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50192 - 2010-06-29

[PDF] WI APP 78
of the marital budget, and adding in an agreed-upon $1000 for savings and investments, the remand court arrived
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50192 - 2014-09-15