Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 921 - 930 of 59698 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 921 - 930 of 59698 for quit claim deed/1000.
Security State Bank v. Dale J. Sechen
and for delivery of the deeds to Northsouth for parcel A and to Lulich for parcels B and C. Standard of Review ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19919 - 2005-12-11
and for delivery of the deeds to Northsouth for parcel A and to Lulich for parcels B and C. Standard of Review ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19919 - 2005-12-11
COURT OF APPEALS
. Bradley Allen appeals a summary judgment dismissing his prescriptive easement claim against the Woelfel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96815 - 2013-05-13
. Bradley Allen appeals a summary judgment dismissing his prescriptive easement claim against the Woelfel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96815 - 2013-05-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
prescriptive easement claim against the Woelfel Family Revocable Trust and its co-trustees, Christian
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96815 - 2014-09-15
prescriptive easement claim against the Woelfel Family Revocable Trust and its co-trustees, Christian
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96815 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
an order granting summary judgment to and dismissing his claims against J. Peter Jungbacker, Karola
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142165 - 2015-05-26
an order granting summary judgment to and dismissing his claims against J. Peter Jungbacker, Karola
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142165 - 2015-05-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to and dismissing his claims against J. Peter Jungbacker, Karola Jungbacker, and Alexander & Bishop, Ltd. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142165 - 2017-09-21
to and dismissing his claims against J. Peter Jungbacker, Karola Jungbacker, and Alexander & Bishop, Ltd. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142165 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Hopson 408513 Wisconsin Secure Program Facility P.O. Box 1000 Boscobel, WI 53805-1000 You
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=950921 - 2025-05-06
. Hopson 408513 Wisconsin Secure Program Facility P.O. Box 1000 Boscobel, WI 53805-1000 You
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=950921 - 2025-05-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Hopson 408513 Wisconsin Secure Program Facility P.O. Box 1000 Boscobel, WI 53805-1000 You
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=950921 - 2025-05-06
. Hopson 408513 Wisconsin Secure Program Facility P.O. Box 1000 Boscobel, WI 53805-1000 You
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=950921 - 2025-05-06
COURT OF APPEALS
or dismissing claims or defenses.” ¶5 On July 23, 2012, approximately six months after it had served Khan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122245 - 2014-09-22
or dismissing claims or defenses.” ¶5 On July 23, 2012, approximately six months after it had served Khan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122245 - 2014-09-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
claimed that Khan had eventually paid the $1000 sanction previously imposed by the court, albeit after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122245 - 2014-09-23
claimed that Khan had eventually paid the $1000 sanction previously imposed by the court, albeit after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122245 - 2014-09-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is entitled to receive $1000 from each of the two circuit court judges who reviewed his petition. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204468 - 2017-12-06
is entitled to receive $1000 from each of the two circuit court judges who reviewed his petition. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204468 - 2017-12-06