Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 921 - 930 of 96742 for state case.
Search results 921 - 930 of 96742 for state case.
[PDF]
State v. Mason S.
.; State v. Bougneit, 97 Wis.2d 687, 690-92, 294 N.W.2d 675, 677-78 (1980). In this case, following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15236 - 2017-09-21
.; State v. Bougneit, 97 Wis.2d 687, 690-92, 294 N.W.2d 675, 677-78 (1980). In this case, following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15236 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Vanessa Brockdorf
. No. 03CM010122 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I STATE OF WISCONSIN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7546 - 2017-09-19
. No. 03CM010122 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I STATE OF WISCONSIN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7546 - 2017-09-19
State v. Teranika H.
,” but then stated, “Another option that the Court could have would be based upon the facts of this case find
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2654 - 2005-03-31
,” but then stated, “Another option that the Court could have would be based upon the facts of this case find
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2654 - 2005-03-31
State v. Eugene Stone
in this case was packaged as individual pieces, and stating that this would not be typical for personal use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2434 - 2005-03-31
in this case was packaged as individual pieces, and stating that this would not be typical for personal use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2434 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jesus Barbary
. They couldn’t handle my case so it was futile to go back to them.” Barbary stated that since they did not want
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11590 - 2005-03-31
. They couldn’t handle my case so it was futile to go back to them.” Barbary stated that since they did not want
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11590 - 2005-03-31
State v. Paula Oltrogge
. No. 99-1071-CR STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15423 - 2005-03-31
. No. 99-1071-CR STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15423 - 2005-03-31
State v. David Barton
Complete Title of Case: † Petition for Review filed State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20764 - 2006-01-24
Complete Title of Case: † Petition for Review filed State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20764 - 2006-01-24
State v. Rodrigo Rodriguez
Ultimately the two cases were tried together.[1] A state drug agent testified that he had arrested Rodriguez
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6893 - 2005-03-31
Ultimately the two cases were tried together.[1] A state drug agent testified that he had arrested Rodriguez
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6893 - 2005-03-31
State v. Rufus Davis
, when placed in context, focused primarily on the strength of the State’s case. A juror could just
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12648 - 2005-03-31
, when placed in context, focused primarily on the strength of the State’s case. A juror could just
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12648 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jimmie Davison
), and the court remanded the case to determine the appropriate remedy under State v. Robinson, 2002 WI 9, 249 Wis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16490 - 2005-03-31
), and the court remanded the case to determine the appropriate remedy under State v. Robinson, 2002 WI 9, 249 Wis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16490 - 2005-03-31