Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 921 - 930 of 7638 for yes.
Search results 921 - 930 of 7638 for yes.
COURT OF APPEALS
it was that your daughter told you had occurred between her and the defendant? A. Yes. Q. What did she tell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30049 - 2007-08-21
it was that your daughter told you had occurred between her and the defendant? A. Yes. Q. What did she tell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30049 - 2007-08-21
COURT OF APPEALS
everything that is said. Is that agreeable, sir? MR. ALI: Yes, sir. Yes, it is. THE COURT: Okay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88856 - 2012-10-31
everything that is said. Is that agreeable, sir? MR. ALI: Yes, sir. Yes, it is. THE COURT: Okay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88856 - 2012-10-31
[PDF]
State v. David L. Harmon
must first be raised in the trial court). No. 99-0330-CR 8 A Yes. Q Okay. So you were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15100 - 2017-09-21
must first be raised in the trial court). No. 99-0330-CR 8 A Yes. Q Okay. So you were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15100 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 30, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
and the word didn’t come up? [OFFICER HUERTA]: Yes, that is correct. [DEFENSE COUNSEL]: And now is it true
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27936 - 2007-01-29
and the word didn’t come up? [OFFICER HUERTA]: Yes, that is correct. [DEFENSE COUNSEL]: And now is it true
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27936 - 2007-01-29
State v. David L. Harmon
had advised you? A Yes. Q Okay. So you were advised of your constitutional rights? A Yes. Q
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15100 - 2005-03-31
had advised you? A Yes. Q Okay. So you were advised of your constitutional rights? A Yes. Q
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15100 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
between her and the defendant? A. Yes. Q. What did she tell you? A. She told me that he invited her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30049 - 2014-09-15
between her and the defendant? A. Yes. Q. What did she tell you? A. She told me that he invited her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30049 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
? …. [NITSCHKE]: I probably was, yes. [DEFENSE COUNSEL]: And if that had been incorrect, would you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30089 - 2007-08-27
? …. [NITSCHKE]: I probably was, yes. [DEFENSE COUNSEL]: And if that had been incorrect, would you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30089 - 2007-08-27
[PDF]
NOTICE
probably was, yes. [DEFENSE COUNSEL]: And if that had been incorrect, would you have felt a duty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30089 - 2014-09-15
probably was, yes. [DEFENSE COUNSEL]: And if that had been incorrect, would you have felt a duty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30089 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to a question: Trial court: And do you understand everything that’s happening here today? Hall: Yes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237654 - 2019-03-19
to a question: Trial court: And do you understand everything that’s happening here today? Hall: Yes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237654 - 2019-03-19
[PDF]
Supreme Court rule 13-14 - Follow-up Report submitted by Hon. Paul Lundsten
litigants, including self- represented litigants, are fairly heard (yes 63%, no 2%). In their narrative
/supreme/docs/1314followupreportlundsten.pdf - 2017-02-01
litigants, including self- represented litigants, are fairly heard (yes 63%, no 2%). In their narrative
/supreme/docs/1314followupreportlundsten.pdf - 2017-02-01