Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9201 - 9210 of 29424 for er.
Search results 9201 - 9210 of 29424 for er.
State v. Antoine J. Russell
).[1] ¶2 Russell claims the trial court erred: (1) in permitting the transcript
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7337 - 2005-03-31
).[1] ¶2 Russell claims the trial court erred: (1) in permitting the transcript
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7337 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the unique facts of this case; and (4) the Board erred by determining that it was not the proper venue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180554 - 2017-09-21
the unique facts of this case; and (4) the Board erred by determining that it was not the proper venue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180554 - 2017-09-21
State v. James S. Riedel
) contrary to Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(a) (1999-2000).[1] Riedel argues that the trial court erred in denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5439 - 2005-03-31
) contrary to Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(a) (1999-2000).[1] Riedel argues that the trial court erred in denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5439 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 51
was not specifically charged as an act of domestic abuse. Edwards further argues that the court erred in finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94530 - 2014-09-15
was not specifically charged as an act of domestic abuse. Edwards further argues that the court erred in finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94530 - 2014-09-15
Jay R. Lellman v. Annette Mott
of the various issues raised by Lellman. Lellman contends that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10953 - 2005-03-31
of the various issues raised by Lellman. Lellman contends that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10953 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in the court erring because “the case should not have proceeded because [Kilbourn] had missed its window
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122802 - 2014-10-01
in the court erring because “the case should not have proceeded because [Kilbourn] had missed its window
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122802 - 2014-10-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of foreclosure, and further contends the circuit court erred in denying the counterclaims by an earlier order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71554 - 2014-09-15
of foreclosure, and further contends the circuit court erred in denying the counterclaims by an earlier order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71554 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Charleetra S. Johnson
modification. Johnson alleges that the trial court: (1) erred when it denied her postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5454 - 2017-09-19
modification. Johnson alleges that the trial court: (1) erred when it denied her postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5454 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Diane Antczak v. River Hills South Investors
. Antczak argues that the trial court erred in concluding that her action was barred under the doctrine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12682 - 2017-09-21
. Antczak argues that the trial court erred in concluding that her action was barred under the doctrine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12682 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
intoxicated, and refusing to submit to a breath alcohol test. He contends the trial court erred in finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=562677 - 2022-09-07
intoxicated, and refusing to submit to a breath alcohol test. He contends the trial court erred in finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=562677 - 2022-09-07