Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9201 - 9210 of 49831 for our.
Search results 9201 - 9210 of 49831 for our.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
. RULE 809.21. After our independent review of the records, we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93229 - 2014-09-15
. RULE 809.21. After our independent review of the records, we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93229 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
exercise of its sentencing discretion. Our review of a sentence determination begins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=754813 - 2024-01-25
exercise of its sentencing discretion. Our review of a sentence determination begins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=754813 - 2024-01-25
[PDF]
State v. David L.s.
a response. He has not responded. From our independent review of the record, we conclude that Gaskell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8796 - 2017-09-19
a response. He has not responded. From our independent review of the record, we conclude that Gaskell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8796 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to file a response to the no-merit report, and he has not responded. Upon our independent review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865575 - 2024-10-22
to file a response to the no-merit report, and he has not responded. Upon our independent review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865575 - 2024-10-22
[PDF]
State v. Estella Marie Iddings
. Our review of the postconviction motion hearing convinces us that the trial court properly concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11451 - 2017-09-19
. Our review of the postconviction motion hearing convinces us that the trial court properly concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11451 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263119 - 2020-06-09
and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263119 - 2020-06-09
COURT OF APPEALS
We note that the guilty plea waiver rule does not deprive us of our subject matter jurisdiction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32829 - 2008-05-27
We note that the guilty plea waiver rule does not deprive us of our subject matter jurisdiction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32829 - 2008-05-27
State v. Leonard Collins, Sr.
. In order to establish finality in our litigation, Escalona-Naranjo prohibits a defendant from pursuing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19873 - 2005-10-10
. In order to establish finality in our litigation, Escalona-Naranjo prohibits a defendant from pursuing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19873 - 2005-10-10
Brenda Robinson v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
to Zeman’s report. There, the employer specified, “Our defense is that it is based upon Dr. Zeman’s [report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4543 - 2005-03-31
to Zeman’s report. There, the employer specified, “Our defense is that it is based upon Dr. Zeman’s [report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4543 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. (WI App Aug. 26, 2014). Our supreme court subsequently denied Anderson’s petition for review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182855 - 2017-09-21
. (WI App Aug. 26, 2014). Our supreme court subsequently denied Anderson’s petition for review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182855 - 2017-09-21