Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9201 - 9210 of 58547 for speedy trial.
Search results 9201 - 9210 of 58547 for speedy trial.
State v. Latrina W.
that trial counsel provided ineffective assistance by: (1) failing to object to “best interest” testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7150 - 2005-03-31
that trial counsel provided ineffective assistance by: (1) failing to object to “best interest” testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7150 - 2005-03-31
State v. Marlon O. Evans
claims of error: (1) he contends his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance, requiring a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18399 - 2005-06-06
claims of error: (1) he contends his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance, requiring a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18399 - 2005-06-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was convicted, following a jury trial, of fourteen counts of second-degree sexual assault by use of force
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=884771 - 2024-12-03
was convicted, following a jury trial, of fourteen counts of second-degree sexual assault by use of force
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=884771 - 2024-12-03
[PDF]
State v. Michael A. Grindemann
” that would warrant a reduction of his sentence, and that the trial court erred in concluding the State had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3657 - 2017-09-19
” that would warrant a reduction of his sentence, and that the trial court erred in concluding the State had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3657 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, and intelligent because the trial court failed in its mandatory duties in the plea colloquy to explain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238298 - 2019-04-02
, and intelligent because the trial court failed in its mandatory duties in the plea colloquy to explain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238298 - 2019-04-02
State v. Larry B. Hooker
was insufficient to support the conviction; and (3) the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6494 - 2005-03-31
was insufficient to support the conviction; and (3) the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6494 - 2005-03-31
Alphonso Hubanks v. Gary R. McCaughtry
appeal.[1] The petition and postconviction motions allege that: (1) Hubanks’ trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13241 - 2005-03-31
appeal.[1] The petition and postconviction motions allege that: (1) Hubanks’ trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13241 - 2005-03-31
State v. Saul R. Lopez
of first-degree reckless injury. However, he was not advised by the trial court that his no contest plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8091 - 2005-03-31
of first-degree reckless injury. However, he was not advised by the trial court that his no contest plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8091 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Carson J. Ward v. Rosemary J. Ward
interests in three life insurance policies. At the time of the trial, Carson and Rosemary Ward had been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7941 - 2017-09-19
interests in three life insurance policies. At the time of the trial, Carson and Rosemary Ward had been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7941 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Larry B. Hooker
of probable cause; (2) the evidence was insufficient to support the conviction; and (3) the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6494 - 2017-09-19
of probable cause; (2) the evidence was insufficient to support the conviction; and (3) the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6494 - 2017-09-19