Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9211 - 9220 of 15404 for probate.
Search results 9211 - 9220 of 15404 for probate.
[PDF]
State v. Sally S. Boerner
he informed her that her probation officer had placed a “hold” on her for violating the terms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13575 - 2017-09-21
he informed her that her probation officer had placed a “hold” on her for violating the terms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13575 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
then did not consider probation as the first alternative. We disagree. ¶15 On appeal, review is limited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68845 - 2014-09-15
then did not consider probation as the first alternative. We disagree. ¶15 On appeal, review is limited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68845 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
these assessments and conclusions, Harasymiw recommended either a long period of probation with intense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121337 - 2014-09-16
these assessments and conclusions, Harasymiw recommended either a long period of probation with intense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121337 - 2014-09-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
then recommend probation. The trial court conducted a Ludwig hearing as requested by the State. See State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=119051 - 2014-09-15
then recommend probation. The trial court conducted a Ludwig hearing as requested by the State. See State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=119051 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Dustin A. Cummings
and five years’ extended supervision was imposed but stayed in favor of ten years’ consecutive probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24710 - 2017-09-21
and five years’ extended supervision was imposed but stayed in favor of ten years’ consecutive probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24710 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, no paperwork had even been filed with the probate court. ¶4 Delsart’s counsel explained that he had taken
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88714 - 2014-09-15
, no paperwork had even been filed with the probate court. ¶4 Delsart’s counsel explained that he had taken
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88714 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
and ordered eleven years’ probation on count two. ¶5 Rose persisted in his efforts to withdraw his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33344 - 2008-07-15
and ordered eleven years’ probation on count two. ¶5 Rose persisted in his efforts to withdraw his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33344 - 2008-07-15
State v. Charles E. Melton
the court he needed treatment and asked for probation so he could receive treatment. ¶21
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20582 - 2005-12-12
the court he needed treatment and asked for probation so he could receive treatment. ¶21
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20582 - 2005-12-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. It noted that this case was “just not a probation situation”—it was “just too serious for that, even
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=221803 - 2018-10-08
. It noted that this case was “just not a probation situation”—it was “just too serious for that, even
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=221803 - 2018-10-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, and it placed Zastrow on three years’ probation to be served consecutive to his sentences in the five
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192188 - 2017-09-21
, and it placed Zastrow on three years’ probation to be served consecutive to his sentences in the five
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192188 - 2017-09-21