Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9211 - 9220 of 12796 for se.
Search results 9211 - 9220 of 12796 for se.
Heidi Frisch v. Ronald J. Henrichs
In August 2002, Heidi filed a pro se contempt motion against Ronald for his failure to provide copies of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21591 - 2006-04-25
In August 2002, Heidi filed a pro se contempt motion against Ronald for his failure to provide copies of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21591 - 2006-04-25
[PDF]
Leslie R. Maddox v. Barricade Flasher Service, Inc.
hours, he was negligent per se. The Maddoxes respond that Maddox did not violate the safety statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11372 - 2017-09-19
hours, he was negligent per se. The Maddoxes respond that Maddox did not violate the safety statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11372 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
exercised its discretion in denying his withdrawal request. He contends that his two pro se letters put
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109744 - 2014-03-31
exercised its discretion in denying his withdrawal request. He contends that his two pro se letters put
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109744 - 2014-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
withdrawal request. He contends that his two pro se letters put the court on notice of trial counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109744 - 2017-09-21
withdrawal request. He contends that his two pro se letters put the court on notice of trial counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109744 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Leslie R. Maddox v. Barricade Flasher Service, Inc.
hours, he was negligent per se. The Maddoxes respond that Maddox did not violate the safety statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10971 - 2017-09-19
hours, he was negligent per se. The Maddoxes respond that Maddox did not violate the safety statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10971 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and sentencing proceedings. He proceeded pro se when he filed his motions for postconviction relief and he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=636888 - 2023-03-23
and sentencing proceedings. He proceeded pro se when he filed his motions for postconviction relief and he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=636888 - 2023-03-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the sufficiency of the evidence, the circuit court’s exercise of sentencing discretion, Lindsey’s pro se motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142363 - 2017-09-21
the sufficiency of the evidence, the circuit court’s exercise of sentencing discretion, Lindsey’s pro se motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142363 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.1 Jon Mark, pro se, appeals a judgment for eviction in favor of his landlord, H&J Properties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=529698 - 2022-06-08
.1 Jon Mark, pro se, appeals a judgment for eviction in favor of his landlord, H&J Properties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=529698 - 2022-06-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Dustin Hewitt, pro se, appeals a judgment convicting him, following a jury trial, of one count
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=982381 - 2025-07-15
. Dustin Hewitt, pro se, appeals a judgment convicting him, following a jury trial, of one count
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=982381 - 2025-07-15
[PDF]
State v. Richard A. Lange
pro se. ¶8 At the time this case was pending before Judge Buslee, Lange had other charges pending
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4420 - 2017-09-19
pro se. ¶8 At the time this case was pending before Judge Buslee, Lange had other charges pending
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4420 - 2017-09-19