Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9211 - 9220 of 58547 for speedy trial.
Search results 9211 - 9220 of 58547 for speedy trial.
State v. Randy A. Davis
for postconviction relief. He claims he is entitled to a new trial in the interest of justice or based upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5835 - 2005-03-31
for postconviction relief. He claims he is entitled to a new trial in the interest of justice or based upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5835 - 2005-03-31
State v. Alphonso Hubanks
appeal.[1] The petition and postconviction motions allege that: (1) Hubanks’ trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13385 - 2005-03-31
appeal.[1] The petition and postconviction motions allege that: (1) Hubanks’ trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13385 - 2005-03-31
Vadim Katznelson v. Stuart Hoffman
a judgment dismissing his action against dentist Stuart Hoffman. The trial court, sua sponte, granted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9623 - 2005-03-31
a judgment dismissing his action against dentist Stuart Hoffman. The trial court, sua sponte, granted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9623 - 2005-03-31
State v. Bradley W. Sexton
concentration, contrary to § 346.63(1)(b). Sexton argues that the trial court erred by not exercising its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4899 - 2005-03-31
concentration, contrary to § 346.63(1)(b). Sexton argues that the trial court erred by not exercising its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4899 - 2005-03-31
State v. Gamel S. Hegwood
provide evidence that Ashley had actually been out of state at the time of Williams’ murder. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5491 - 2005-03-31
provide evidence that Ashley had actually been out of state at the time of Williams’ murder. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5491 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
(2011‑12).[1] Because we conclude that the trial court properly exercised its discretion when denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113094 - 2014-05-27
(2011‑12).[1] Because we conclude that the trial court properly exercised its discretion when denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113094 - 2014-05-27
COURT OF APPEALS
trial based on newly discovered evidence; (2) he received ineffective assistance of postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90212 - 2012-12-10
trial based on newly discovered evidence; (2) he received ineffective assistance of postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90212 - 2012-12-10
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey S. Amerson
with a prohibited alcohol concentration of .08% or more. Amerson contends the trial court erred when it: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12081 - 2017-09-21
with a prohibited alcohol concentration of .08% or more. Amerson contends the trial court erred when it: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12081 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. STAT. § 973.198 No. 2013AP313-CR 2 (2011-12). 1 Because we conclude that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113094 - 2017-09-21
. STAT. § 973.198 No. 2013AP313-CR 2 (2011-12). 1 Because we conclude that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113094 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. James W.
)(a). James W. waived his right to a jury trial. The trial court dismissed the failure-to- assume-parental
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25338 - 2017-09-21
)(a). James W. waived his right to a jury trial. The trial court dismissed the failure-to- assume-parental
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25338 - 2017-09-21