Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9241 - 9250 of 43021 for WA 0821 7001 0763 (FORTRESS) Pintu Baja Set Sudimoro Pacitan.
Search results 9241 - 9250 of 43021 for WA 0821 7001 0763 (FORTRESS) Pintu Baja Set Sudimoro Pacitan.
[PDF]
Edwin C. West v. Byran Bartow
County judge which committed Mr. West to the setting that he now finds himself in. The attack that’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3821 - 2017-09-20
County judge which committed Mr. West to the setting that he now finds himself in. The attack that’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3821 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
motion did not request setting aside the original sentence and starting over with a new sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87973 - 2014-09-15
motion did not request setting aside the original sentence and starting over with a new sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87973 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
factor” is “a fact or set of facts highly relevant to the imposition of sentence, but not known
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114105 - 2017-09-21
factor” is “a fact or set of facts highly relevant to the imposition of sentence, but not known
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114105 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that he had set Walters up, which was consistent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255750 - 2020-03-03
that he had set Walters up, which was consistent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255750 - 2020-03-03
COURT OF APPEALS
closing arguments with the judge’s sentencing remarks and they set the tone for the argument that followed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84133 - 2012-07-02
closing arguments with the judge’s sentencing remarks and they set the tone for the argument that followed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84133 - 2012-07-02
COURT OF APPEALS
forfeited this argument by failing to set forth an offer of proof as to what his testimony would be. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52724 - 2010-08-02
forfeited this argument by failing to set forth an offer of proof as to what his testimony would be. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52724 - 2010-08-02
[PDF]
NOTICE
Wis. 2d 1, 8-10, 434 N.W.2d 609 (1989). A new factor is “a fact or set of facts highly relevant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30159 - 2014-09-15
Wis. 2d 1, 8-10, 434 N.W.2d 609 (1989). A new factor is “a fact or set of facts highly relevant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30159 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
with the duties of a staff advocate set forth in WIS. ADMIN. CODE § DOC 303.78, the applicable code section
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142575 - 2017-09-21
with the duties of a staff advocate set forth in WIS. ADMIN. CODE § DOC 303.78, the applicable code section
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142575 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
asked the circuit court to set a briefing schedule on the motion. At the December 18, 2020 hearing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=600570 - 2022-12-14
asked the circuit court to set a briefing schedule on the motion. At the December 18, 2020 hearing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=600570 - 2022-12-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independently determine whether the facts set forth in a postconviction motion require an evidentiary hearing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134027 - 2017-09-21
independently determine whether the facts set forth in a postconviction motion require an evidentiary hearing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134027 - 2017-09-21