Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9241 - 9250 of 24568 for extending.
Search results 9241 - 9250 of 24568 for extending.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of extended supervision, consecutive to other sentences he was serving. This no-merit appeal follows
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=783303 - 2024-04-03
of extended supervision, consecutive to other sentences he was serving. This no-merit appeal follows
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=783303 - 2024-04-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
confinement and eight years of extended supervision. Prior to entering his pleas, Howard moved to suppress
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=711426 - 2023-10-11
confinement and eight years of extended supervision. Prior to entering his pleas, Howard moved to suppress
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=711426 - 2023-10-11
[PDF]
Irma T. Wiedmeyer v. Doris E. Carriveau
that Wiedmeyer had not complied with her discovery demand. On February 20, 1998, Wiedmeyer moved to extend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14009 - 2014-09-15
that Wiedmeyer had not complied with her discovery demand. On February 20, 1998, Wiedmeyer moved to extend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14009 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Carolyn A. Smiley v. William A. Smiley
schedule allowing for less frequent but more extended visits. The parties failed to agree on whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7796 - 2017-09-19
schedule allowing for less frequent but more extended visits. The parties failed to agree on whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7796 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
’ extended supervision, concurrent with Coben’s other sentence. Nine months later, Coben filed a motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139014 - 2017-09-21
’ extended supervision, concurrent with Coben’s other sentence. Nine months later, Coben filed a motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139014 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
years of initial confinement followed by three years of extended supervision. In April 2014, Knoebel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135463 - 2017-09-21
years of initial confinement followed by three years of extended supervision. In April 2014, Knoebel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135463 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to four years’ initial confinement and six years’ extended supervision. This no-merit appeal followed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161598 - 2017-09-21
to four years’ initial confinement and six years’ extended supervision. This no-merit appeal followed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161598 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of initial confinement and two years of extended supervision. This appeal from the sentence following
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=478690 - 2022-02-03
of initial confinement and two years of extended supervision. This appeal from the sentence following
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=478690 - 2022-02-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of four years’ initial confinement followed by five years’ extended supervision on the count of causing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=597920 - 2022-12-06
of four years’ initial confinement followed by five years’ extended supervision on the count of causing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=597920 - 2022-12-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
confinement and six years of extended supervision. This no-merit report follows. Appellate counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1051789 - 2025-12-23
confinement and six years of extended supervision. This no-merit report follows. Appellate counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1051789 - 2025-12-23