Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9241 - 9250 of 63197 for records.
Search results 9241 - 9250 of 63197 for records.
[PDF]
State v. Thomas J. Becker
not filed a response to it. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10494 - 2017-09-20
not filed a response to it. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10494 - 2017-09-20
CA Blank Order
to respond to the report and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95391 - 2013-04-15
to respond to the report and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95391 - 2013-04-15
CA Blank Order
reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues with arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106265 - 2014-01-07
reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues with arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106265 - 2014-01-07
State v. Fectory E. Spears
-year prison term. Upon review of the record, we are satisfied that the no merit report properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14706 - 2005-03-31
-year prison term. Upon review of the record, we are satisfied that the no merit report properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14706 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a supplemental no-merit report. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=153618 - 2017-09-21
a supplemental no-merit report. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=153618 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
consideration of the report, Vogel’s response, and an independent review of the Record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=665145 - 2023-06-07
consideration of the report, Vogel’s response, and an independent review of the Record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=665145 - 2023-06-07
[PDF]
State v. Thomas J. Becker
not filed a response to it. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10493 - 2017-09-20
not filed a response to it. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10493 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
assigned to a different judge for resentencing.” The record shows that shortly after that order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34165 - 2008-09-29
assigned to a different judge for resentencing.” The record shows that shortly after that order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34165 - 2008-09-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on the record and the appellant’s brief. No. 2014AP453 3 Bevan. The court granted Bevan’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=129474 - 2017-09-21
on the record and the appellant’s brief. No. 2014AP453 3 Bevan. The court granted Bevan’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=129474 - 2017-09-21
State v. Michael W. Fink
. Upon review of the record, we are satisfied that the no merit report properly analyzes these issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9372 - 2005-03-31
. Upon review of the record, we are satisfied that the no merit report properly analyzes these issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9372 - 2005-03-31