Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9251 - 9260 of 50071 for our.
Search results 9251 - 9260 of 50071 for our.
CA Blank Order
at this point in the proceedings relate to sentencing following revocation. Our review of a sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119691 - 2014-08-17
at this point in the proceedings relate to sentencing following revocation. Our review of a sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119691 - 2014-08-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
No. 2014AP2113-CRNM 3 overcome our presumption that the sentence was reasonable. State v. Ramuta, 2003
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155850 - 2017-09-21
No. 2014AP2113-CRNM 3 overcome our presumption that the sentence was reasonable. State v. Ramuta, 2003
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155850 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
court erred in denying his petition because he is indigent and will prevail on appeal. Based upon our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=794198 - 2024-05-01
court erred in denying his petition because he is indigent and will prevail on appeal. Based upon our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=794198 - 2024-05-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110487 - 2017-09-21
and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110487 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
sentencing discretion must overcome our presumption that the sentence was reasonable. State v. Ramuta, 2003
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104949 - 2013-11-25
sentencing discretion must overcome our presumption that the sentence was reasonable. State v. Ramuta, 2003
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104949 - 2013-11-25
[PDF]
Mayville Die & Tool, Inc. v. Weller Machinery Company
. 1997) (setting forth the standard methodology for our review of summary judgment determinations), we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4048 - 2017-09-20
. 1997) (setting forth the standard methodology for our review of summary judgment determinations), we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4048 - 2017-09-20
CA Blank Order
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138598 - 2015-03-30
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138598 - 2015-03-30
COURT OF APPEALS
appellant is David Finkbiner. Following our order, Finkbiner filed four motions for reconsideration, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106335 - 2014-01-06
appellant is David Finkbiner. Following our order, Finkbiner filed four motions for reconsideration, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106335 - 2014-01-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259305 - 2020-05-05
our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259305 - 2020-05-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in the proceedings relate to sentencing following revocation. Our review of a sentence determination begins
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105252 - 2017-09-21
in the proceedings relate to sentencing following revocation. Our review of a sentence determination begins
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105252 - 2017-09-21