Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9271 - 9280 of 50107 for our.
Search results 9271 - 9280 of 50107 for our.
[PDF]
State v. William C. Rosenberg
decisions are left to the sound discretion of the circuit court and our review of a sentencing decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15847 - 2017-09-21
decisions are left to the sound discretion of the circuit court and our review of a sentencing decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15847 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and has responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174582 - 2017-09-21
and has responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174582 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Jurek and Dr. Allen also both testified that Miller was more likely than not to reoffend. Our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220123 - 2018-09-26
. Jurek and Dr. Allen also both testified that Miller was more likely than not to reoffend. Our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220123 - 2018-09-26
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
the judgment under WIS. STAT. § 806.07(1)(h) (2011-12).1 Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95302 - 2014-09-15
the judgment under WIS. STAT. § 806.07(1)(h) (2011-12).1 Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95302 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. The court determined that Jackson’s motion was procedurally barred. Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=926616 - 2025-03-12
. The court determined that Jackson’s motion was procedurally barred. Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=926616 - 2025-03-12
COURT OF APPEALS
our attention to any submissions in that regard. ¶6 There may be arguments that the parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40640 - 2009-09-09
our attention to any submissions in that regard. ¶6 There may be arguments that the parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40640 - 2009-09-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1036839 - 2025-11-13
on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1036839 - 2025-11-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Perkins appeals pro se from an order denying his motion for sentence modification. Based on our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138484 - 2017-09-21
. Perkins appeals pro se from an order denying his motion for sentence modification. Based on our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138484 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
; and the propriety of the sentence. Appellate counsel adequately discusses these potential issues. After our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244530 - 2019-08-07
; and the propriety of the sentence. Appellate counsel adequately discusses these potential issues. After our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244530 - 2019-08-07
[PDF]
NOTICE
supporting a conviction, we may not substitute our judgment for the jury’s “unless the evidence, viewed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63154 - 2014-09-15
supporting a conviction, we may not substitute our judgment for the jury’s “unless the evidence, viewed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63154 - 2014-09-15