Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9271 - 9280 of 19294 for transfer by affidavit.
Search results 9271 - 9280 of 19294 for transfer by affidavit.
CA Blank Order
the record, the no-merit report, the supplemental no-merit report and the supporting affidavit, this court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123504 - 2014-10-06
the record, the no-merit report, the supplemental no-merit report and the supporting affidavit, this court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123504 - 2014-10-06
COURT OF APPEALS
to stop the car. In support of this finding, the court relied on the officer’s testimony and an affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54341 - 2010-09-14
to stop the car. In support of this finding, the court relied on the officer’s testimony and an affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54341 - 2010-09-14
COURT OF APPEALS
, and the record contradicted his affidavit that he was present at a hearing where the court dismissed the refusal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107325 - 2014-01-22
, and the record contradicted his affidavit that he was present at a hearing where the court dismissed the refusal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107325 - 2014-01-22
[PDF]
State v. Danny L. Peterson
on the date of Peterson’s arrest. ¶12 The only postconviction affidavit is from Peterson’s postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20676 - 2017-09-21
on the date of Peterson’s arrest. ¶12 The only postconviction affidavit is from Peterson’s postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20676 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Wisconsin Housing and Economic Development Authority v. Robert W. Stanek
. They are mistaken. WHEDA’s affidavit in support of default judgment provided that “the defendants in this action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3338 - 2017-09-19
. They are mistaken. WHEDA’s affidavit in support of default judgment provided that “the defendants in this action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3338 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Lyle L. Smith v. Kenneth J. Bosveld
affidavits are in sharp conflict as to the terms of their agreement. The Smiths contend that the agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12388 - 2017-09-21
affidavits are in sharp conflict as to the terms of their agreement. The Smiths contend that the agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12388 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Samuel L. Hogan
, he had several conversations with Clarke about the events in question. His affidavit was entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11514 - 2017-09-19
, he had several conversations with Clarke about the events in question. His affidavit was entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11514 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
Mitchell moved for reconsideration and submitted an affidavit from his postconviction attorney in support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33035 - 2008-06-16
Mitchell moved for reconsideration and submitted an affidavit from his postconviction attorney in support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33035 - 2008-06-16
Susan Shoemaker v. The Hearst Corporation
affidavits to determine whether they establish a prima facie case for summary judgment. Id. If they do, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3563 - 2005-03-31
affidavits to determine whether they establish a prima facie case for summary judgment. Id. If they do, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3563 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Jay Richard Sorensen v. Terri Lynn Schnorr-Sorensen
by a lengthy memorandum brief and the affidavits of thirteen people. Motions under § 806.07, STATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13328 - 2017-09-21
by a lengthy memorandum brief and the affidavits of thirteen people. Motions under § 806.07, STATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13328 - 2017-09-21